Hi,
I'm currently going through the list of rdeps of hal [1], which is dead
since a long time and no longer functional.
One is hwinfo, which debian-edu recommends and goto-common depends on.
Question now is, if we should drop hwinfo and update goto-common and
eduction-common to no longer referenc
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Yes, there is a way. Inspecting the log I've posted. Could you please
> have a real look at the list?
Could you provide examples from that list, please? You already parsed it it
seems.
> Moreover: Future packages should get some addit
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 03:51:06PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> (are you still subscribed to the edu list?)
Sure I am! And according to the liststats[1] I'm struggling hard to
remain the top 6th poster but I'll probably loose this position soon to
Mike. ;-)
> On Mittwoch, 16.
Hi,
so we have released our Debian Wheezy based release, yay! So, lets continue
and eventually finish our GIT migration now.
The current status is documented at
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/HowTo/Git/SVN2GitMigrationStatus
and we have a GIT usage howto at https://wiki.debian.org/DebianEd
Hi Andreas,
(are you still subscribed to the edu list?)
On Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013, Andreas Tille wrote:
> The approach remains valid - but this is *not* the problem in your tasks
> files at all. You did not updated your tasks files with not *yet*
> available packages - you are just keeping c
Hi Holger,
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 02:24:55PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Debian Edu tasks files are in a *very* weak state.
>
> why do you call it weak? Because we are less likely to notice new failures?
There will be no failures actual
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> What happened here? The build just downgraded some packages in the
> production repository? debian-edu-artwork went from 0.45-1 to 0.0.33-3,
thats the version which was in wheezy _before_ the 7.2 pointrelease, very
strange.
> gos
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Debian Edu tasks files are in a *very* weak state.
why do you call it weak? Because we are less likely to notice new failures?
> You should fix all
> the packages mentioned in your tasks file because in the worst case you
> will lack tho
Source: debian-edu
Severity: important
Hi,
Debian Edu tasks files are in a *very* weak state. You should fix all
the packages mentioned in your tasks file because in the worst case you
will lack those packages who are renamed or have better alternatives in
your resulting metapackages. I attache
9 matches
Mail list logo