Hi,
> Like reported in #993935, a local admin might install additional
> packages on a combined server causing potential leakage of sensible data
> in the SquashFS image file for diskless workstations.
>
> It would be quite easy to drop the diskless workstation support (done by
> default at fir
Hi Dominik,
do you have time to test / review the debian-edu-ltsp-install script
changes?
Any additional excludes needed? The excludes actually don't need to
exist - for example I've added 'etc/freeradius' just in case someone
uses the provided script to set up freeRadius.
[ Wolfgang Schweer
[ Dominik George, 2021-09-09 ]
> > It would be quite easy to drop the diskless workstation support
> > (done by default at first boot of a combined server), only provide
> > thin client support on the combined server and leave the (site
> > specific) setup for diskless ws to the local admin. (T
Package: debian-edu-config
Version: 2.12.1
Severity: wishlist
Like reported in #993935, a local admin might install additional
packages on a combined server causing potential leakage of sensible data
in the SquashFS image file for diskless workstations.
It would be quite easy to drop the diskles
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #993935 [debian-edu-config] debian-edu-ltsp-install: Netboot image exposes
private data and crypto keys
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #993935 to the same tags previously set
--
993935: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=99
5 matches
Mail list logo
