On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 08:46:02PM +0200, Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 02:05:19PM +0200, Philipp Huebner wrote:
I think it would be the best thing to decide on either tool soon, and
than work on getting that fully implemented.
Neither one seems to be perfect (yet?), but w
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 02:05:19PM +0200, Philipp Huebner wrote:
>
> something to be considered:
>
> I believe gosa and cipux to be incompatible. Both bring their own ldap
> schemes, and I know that CipUX breaks LWAT (at least partially).
>
> For these reasons I think we have to decide on ei
Hi,
something to be considered:
I believe gosa and cipux to be incompatible. Both bring their own ldap
schemes, and I know that CipUX breaks LWAT (at least partially).
For these reasons I think we have to decide on either one, and that
offering Gosa to the admins and a CipUX Frontend to the teac
Hi all,
there have been discussions on the list about perspectives for our
LDAP GUI (CIPUX, GOsa, LWAT, in alphabetical order ;-), or even
new programs). Stimulated by them, I would like to propose a way how to
proceed. As usual, this is my personal view and discussing the
arguments is appreciated
4 matches
Mail list logo
