gt; each issue with details on solutions, etc.
> Is the standard bug tracking tool enough. maybe it's not "dynamic"
> enough ??
>
> I guess something in the following is a good start.
>http://www.emdebian.org/
>http://www.emdebian.org/crush/index.html
>
>
Hello Everyone --
Hector, Neil, Simon, and the other list members who have recently posted
your suggestions and ideas on how to move ahead on Crush 2.0 your
contributions are very much appreciated.
Now that we appear to be headed toward better scoping Neil's issues list,
can I suggest you referen
009 at 10:58 AM, Hector Oron wrote:
> Hi Prince,
>
> En/na Prince Riley ha escrit:
> > 1) Please list the items in order of important and priority (using
> > Neil's item numbers)
>
> [DESIGN & CONCEPT]
> IMHO, multiarch is one of the priorities and we shou
Hello Everyone --
Again thanks to both of the list members who answered my earlier post.
To keep the discussions as clear and productive I suggest we limit it this
weeks to comments, suggestions, etc. that address the points Neil raised in
his most recent post. Here is my summary of those points:
developer/maintainer.
I there anyway to partition this so that a smaller knowledge/experience
base is required to contribute ??
I notice uClibc is a candidate, but I remember a post about embedded
glibc which was/is a smaller lighter libc based on glibc sources. Would
this be a better candidate t
summary.
Thanks again to everyone.
Prince
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:52:22 +
> Prince Riley wrote:
>
> > Neil,
> >
> > We are all very glad and appreciative of the great work you've done
> > so fa
Hello Everyone,
Just a short note --
As this discussion moves forward I want everyone to be as clear as they can
in describing their ideas, recommendations, and advice in a way that allows
us all to appreciate and understand what is being said.
To that end, I'd like to propose/ask we structure t
Hello everyone,
Since Neil's post to the list that he can no longer devote his time to
working on Crush 2.0, we should open a discussion of how to move forward in
his absence.
Neil replied with a list of project items (which I have included again in
this post) that give us a starting point in pu
outlined over time.
It's now abundantly clear that we have a good deal of work ahead of us and
it now falls on the rest of the list to discuss and resolve how to continue
to move ahead.
Again, my very best wishes
Prince Riley
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 5
move ahead during your absence. Perhaps you can offer
some advice or recommendations on how members of this list can help you
transition your efforts so we can maintain the project's momentum and
achieve its goals.
Prince Riley
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Bill Gatliff wrote:
>
t there to really
bother going back to square one.
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Prince Riley [2009-04-26 19:34 +]:
> >Hello Everyone,
> >
> >Martin contributed a basic embedded development use case in a recent
> post
> >
Richard,
I am sending this post over the the Embedded Debian group where there should
be a topic started on using Debian for the SheevaPlug.
Prince
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Rickard Nilsson
wrote:
> Den 2009-04-26 13:39:17 skrev David Given :
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Ha
Hello Everyone,
Martin contributed a basic embedded development use case in a recent post
to the list. I would like to add to that case a few more points.
- The embedded development market is driven by chipsets and dev boards.
At the moment the Intel processors (VIA, Atom), and ARM proces
13 matches
Mail list logo
