Hi,
>
> Brian and Henk, i think you make the point.
> Even with iptables loading the inactive ruleset, i've got all ports
> opened.
>
> I don't understand why you are speaking of "inetd" ?
> Cause i've got inetd running on the machine...
Well, check /etc/inetd.conf and make sure that thi
fo on monday !
Mathieu.
Le jeudi 06 avril 2006 à 20:01 +0100, Dave Ewart a écrit :
On Thursday, 06.04.2006 at 18:38 +0200, Robin-Vinet Mathieu wrote:
> Ok. In fact, i'm launching Nmap over internet from my office at work
> to our hired server protected by Iptables somewhere in Fra
Hi,
Brian and Henk, i think you make the point.
Even with iptables loading the inactive ruleset, i've got all ports opened.
I don't understand why you are speaking of "inetd" ?
Cause i've got inetd running on the machine...
Did i miss something somewhere ?
Thanks.
Mathieu.
Le vendredi 07
quot; to "close" or "stealth"
_
Personalizza MSN Messenger con sfondi e fotografie!
http://www.ilovemessenger.msn.it/
--
Robin-Vinet Mathieu
Hi,
Le jeudi 06 avril 2006 à 15:39 +0100, Dave Ewart a écrit :
On Thursday, 06.04.2006 at 16:06 +0200, Robin-Vinet Mathieu wrote:
> I've got a question, about how DROPPED packets are shown to TCP
> scanners such as Nmap.
>
> I've done an IPtables script wich does wha
Salut,
Le jeudi 06 avril 2006 à 17:15 +0200, Pascal Hambourg a écrit :
Salut,
Robin-Vinet Mathieu a écrit :
>
> I've got a question, about how DROPPED packets are shown to TCP scanners
> such as Nmap.
With nmap, it seems to depend on the TCP scan type.
My results with
last "closed", but i'd prefer "stealth".
Is it normal ? If not, do you know how can i solve that ?
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
--
Robin-Vinet Mathieu
7 matches
Mail list logo
