Re: more patch bugs in current gcc-2.95.3?

2001-03-25 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Matthias Klose wrote: > Does the current source version (-8) work ok on all architectures? > I remember someone of you said something about non applicable > patches, or an out of date patch from Franz Sirl. > Recent binaries exist for the hurd, i386, mips and sparc. The patc

more patch bugs in current gcc-2.95.3?

2001-03-25 Thread Matthias Klose
Does the current source version (-8) work ok on all architectures? I remember someone of you said something about non applicable patches, or an out of date patch from Franz Sirl. Recent binaries exist for the hurd, i386, mips and sparc. this patch is already fixed in CVS: Torsten Landschoff write

Bug#90630: marked as done (altgcc: There's no longer a libc5 on m68k)

2001-03-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Mar 2001 01:10:06 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in altgcc-2.7.2.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#87659: marked as done (altgcc: Build-Depends: texinfo)

2001-03-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Mar 2001 01:10:06 +0200 (MEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in altgcc-2.7.2.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r