On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 11:27:26PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 02:28:17PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 08:05:08PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> > > stage1/collect2 -Y P,/usr/lib -dynamic-linker /lib/ld.so.1 -o gencheck
> > > /usr/lib/crt1.o /us
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 02:28:17PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> See that link line? There is no "-lc". That's where the problem is
> coming from, and I've no idea why -lc isn't there. Check the mips headers
> in gcc/config/ and the generated spec file to see if you can find where it
> adds the crten
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 02:28:17PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 08:05:08PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> > stage1/collect2 -Y P,/usr/lib -dynamic-linker /lib/ld.so.1 -o gencheck
> > /usr/lib/crt1.o /usr/lib/crti.o stage1/crtbegin.o -Lstage1 gencheck.o
> > obstack.o -lgcc
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 08:05:08PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> stage1/collect2 -Y P,/usr/lib -dynamic-linker /lib/ld.so.1 -o gencheck
> /usr/lib/crt1.o /usr/lib/crti.o stage1/crtbegin.o -Lstage1 gencheck.o
> obstack.o -lgcc -lgcc stage1/crtend.o /usr/lib/crtn.o
> /usr/lib/crt1.o: In function
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 01:39:08PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 07:08:01PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> > gencheck.o ` case "obstack.o" in ?*) echo obstack.o ;; esac ` ` case "" in
> > ?*) echo ;; esac ` ` case "" in ?*) echo ;; esac ` ` case "" in ?*) echo
> > ;; es
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 07:08:01PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
>
> Hi,
> i am trying to bootstrap debian-mipsel (once again) and failed to build
> gcc 2.95.3 (gcc-2.95_2.95.3.ds5-10.dsc) for building glibc 2.2.2
>
> I am currently running egcs 1.1.2, binutils 2.11.90.0.1, glibc 2.0.6
> and the b
Hi,
i am trying to bootstrap debian-mipsel (once again) and failed to build
gcc 2.95.3 (gcc-2.95_2.95.3.ds5-10.dsc) for building glibc 2.2.2
I am currently running egcs 1.1.2, binutils 2.11.90.0.1, glibc 2.0.6
and the build fails with.
I found this message http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc-0103
James Blackwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Package: libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1
>Version: 2.91.66-4
>Date; 1 April 2001
>
>When attempting to cheat on my algebra homework, I attempted to square
>some numbers via the sqrt (see man 3 sqrt) function. Howevever, the
>following c program
Your message dated Mon, 2 Apr 2001 00:34:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#92526: glibc missing vital component
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1
Version: 2.91.66-4
Date; 1 April 2001
When attempting to cheat on my algebra homework, I attempted to square
some numbers via the sqrt (see man 3 sqrt) function. Howevever, the
following c program fails to compile:
#include
main() {
double i=9;double j;
Package: libstdc++2.10-dev
Version: 2.95.3-9
The CPU time taken by stringstream is quadratic in the length
of the string buffer. This makes stringstream unusable for
large (but not unreasonably large) contents.
The problem is this line in std::stringbuf::overflow:
stream_len += 1;
11 matches
Mail list logo