Bug#101069: ld cannot find -lgcc_s

2001-06-15 Thread Evan Prodromou
Package: gcj-3.0 Version: 1:3.0-0pre010613 Taking a simple Java program as follows: ---8<--- public class Hello { public static void main(String[] argv) { System.out.println("Hello, World!"); } } ---8<--- And trying to compile it with gcj-3.0 gives the following error: ---8<---

New gcc-3.0 hppa patch

2001-06-15 Thread Matt Taggart
Hi debian-gcc, I have placed the latest hppa patch for gcc-3.0 at, http://www.parisc-linux.org/~taggart/0613/hppa-build.dpatch It applies ok(some offsets) against version 3.0.ds8-0pre010613 of the package. In addition to this patch I had to add hppa to the Java disable section of rules.defs. C

Bug#100988: libgcc_s.so points to nowhere

2001-06-15 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Package: gcc-3.0 Version: 1:3.0-0pre010613 /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.0/libgcc_s.so -> /lib/libgcc_s.so.0 while libgcc0 contains: /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 Please fix the inconsistency. This results in a very unintuitive: $ gcj-3.0 Hello.java --main=Hello /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s colle

Bug#100983: gcc-3.0-010613 refuses to compile programs

2001-06-15 Thread Petr Vandrovec
Package: libgcc0 Version: 3.0-0pre010613 Severity: critical Hi, gcc-3.0_3.0-0pre010613 contains lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2001-06-14 03:05:57 ./usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.0/libgcc_s.so -> /lib/libgcc_s.so.0 while libgcc0_3.0-0pre010613 contains -rw-r--r-- root/root 27036 2001-06-1

Re: gcc-3.0 update

2001-06-15 Thread Matthias Klose
severity 100696 normal retitle 100696 [m68k] official release won't work on m68k, bootstrap error thanks Roman Zippel writes: > Hi, > > Matthias Klose wrote: > > > m68k- status unknown, no build reports upstream (May, June) > > I will be very likely that the official release won't wo

Bug#100483: marked as done (gcc-3.0-doc: dangling symbolic link)

2001-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#100863: marked as done (Instalation problem: c-tree-300.info.gz don't exist)

2001-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#100459: marked as done (Installation of gcc-3.0-doc fails)

2001-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#100447: marked as done (gcc-3.0-doc: Installation fails)

2001-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:57:55 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds8-0pre010613) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y