Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 3.0.ds9-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of gcc-3.0_3.0.ds9-1 on resume.rfc822.org by sbuild/mips 1.158
> Build started at 20010620-0013
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Dep
Package: libstdc++3-doc
Version: 1:3.0-0pre010609
Severity: normal
file:/usr/share/doc/gcc-3.0-base/libstdc++/html_user/index.html
Link called "The GNU stdc++ library version 3" points to a file
in gcc-3.0-base's doc dir, which doesn't exist. It seems that
the correct URI should be
file:/usr/sha
severity 100696 normal
retitle 100696 [m68k] gcc-3.0 doesn't bootstrap on m68k-linux
thanks
Lowering the severity of this report. It's "m68k" only and m68k isn't
yet supported by gcc-3.0. AFAIK the severity of the report would
prohibit the migration of gcc-3.0 to testing.
PS: I did send this to c
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:43:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:43:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 100696 normal
Bug#100696: failed build of gcc-3.0_3.0.ds7-0pre010609 (m68k): internal
compiler error with xgcc
Severity set to `normal'.
> retitle 100696 [m68k] gcc-3.0 doesn't bootstrap on m68k-linux
Bug#100696: failed build of gcc-3.0_3.0.
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:43:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:43:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:43:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Package: gcc-3.0-base
Version: 1:3.0-1
Severity: minor
The info in /usr/share/doc/gcc-3.0-base/README.FIRST does not longer
apply now that gcc-3.0 has been released as stable. It can safely be
removed.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux sledgeh
Installing:
libstdc++3-dbg_3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/libstdc++3-dbg_3.0-1_i386.deb
libstdc++3-dev_3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/libstdc++3-dev_3.0-1_i386.deb
gcc-3.0-doc_3.0-1_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/gcc-3.0-doc_3.0-1_all.deb
libstdc++3_3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/mai
There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libstdc++3_3.0-1_i386.deb: priority is overridden from required to standard.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the package wr
Christopher C. Chimelis writes:
> Do we really need the doxygen part anyway? It's not compilable on Alpha
> unless we use gcc-3.0 anyway (and even then, it's untested...it's that bad
> C++ problem with 2.95.x that kept it from working from what I can tell).
It's not needed for the binary-arch
13 matches
Mail list logo
