Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:31:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcj-3.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 43001 [fixed in 3.0] [alpha] gcc 2.95.2 19990906 Internal compiler
> error in `fixup_var_refs_1'
Bug#43001: [alpha] gcc 2.95.2 19990906 Internal compiler error in
`fixup_var_refs_1'
Changed Bug title.
> tags 43001 + fixed
Bug#43001: [fixed in
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:31:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcj-3.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:31:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcj-3.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:31:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcj-3.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:31:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcj-3.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:27:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line r-base on alpha
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:04:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 03:58:07PM -0700, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 12:00:36AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Ok to enable -fuse-cxa-atexit as default? According to Laurents
> > citations this should be safe for Linux glibc. Safe for the Hurd as
> > well?
>
> Should be.
Installing:
gobjc-3.0_3.0-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/gobjc-3.0_3.0-2_i386.deb
gcc-3.0_3.0.ds9-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/gcc-3.0_3.0.ds9-2.diff.gz
libobjc1_3.0-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/libobjc1_3.0-2_i386.deb
fastjar_3.0-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/fastjar_3.0-2
There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libstdc++3_3.0-2_i386.deb: priority is overridden from required to standard.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the package wr
Installing:
cpp-3.0_3.0-2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/cpp-3.0_3.0-2_powerpc.deb
libobjc1_3.0-2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/libobjc1_3.0-2_powerpc.deb
protoize_3.0-2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/protoize_3.0-2_powerpc.deb
g++-3.0_3.0-2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 101795 perl
Bug#101795: dist-upgrade fails: perl: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.2' not
found (required by /lib/libdb.so.3)
Bug reassigned from package `libstdc++2.10-dev' to `perl'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
reassign 101795 perl
thanks
the error occurs when perl runs during the install process. at least
that I deduce from the error log.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 100571 92524
Bug#92524: Severe performance problem with sstream
Bug#100571: libstdc++2.10-dev: sstream still buggy in 2.95.4-0.010604
Merged 92524 100571.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 62309 + fixed
Bug#62309: [fixed in 3.0] Internal compiler error: program cc1obj got fatal
signal 11
Tags added: fixed
> tags 83221 + fixed
Bug#83221: [fixed in 3.0] g++ dies with internal error
Tags added: fixed
> tags 87540 + fixed
Bug#87540: [
Activadores biológicos naturales para eliminar olores en pozos sépticos,
depuradoras, etc.
http://www.ctv.es/clean_world_hispania/
http://www.ctv.es/clean_world_hispania/odour.htm
http://www.ctv.es/clean_world_hispania/fosassepticaspozossepticos.htm
http://www.ctv.es/clean_world_hispania/enviosPO
Activadores biológicos naturales para eliminar olores en pozos sépticos,
depuradoras, etc.
http://www.ctv.es/clean_world_hispania/
http://www.ctv.es/clean_world_hispania/odour.htm
http://www.ctv.es/clean_world_hispania/fosassepticaspozossepticos.htm
http://www.ctv.es/clean_world_hispania/enviosPO
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2001 18:00:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#101876: please change ia64 default to 2.96
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 88220 atlas2
Bug#88220: no package for PowerPC
Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `atlas2'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 62309 [fixed in 3.0] Internal compiler error: program cc1obj got
> fatal signal 11
Bug#62309: gobjc: gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1obj got fatal signal
11
Changed Bug title.
> tags 62309 +fixed
Unknown tag/s: +fixed.
Recognized are
reassign 88220 atlas2
thanks
please provide:
- the compiler versions used/tested (both 2.95 and 3.0)
- the preprocessed source
if the bug is fixed in gcc-3.0, close it, if not, reassign it to gcc.
Thanks, Matthias
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 88220 gcc
Bug#88220: no package for PowerPC
Bug reassigned from package `atlas2' to `gcc'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
strange. unable to reproduce. could you send the preprocessed input
and run it with -H please?
rb writes:
> I've installed gcc-3.0
> This code:
> #include
> int main () {
> return 0;
> }
> gives syntax error to me.
> Attached there is a little more.
> Can you say anything.
> My solutio
I've installed gcc-3.0
This code:
#include
int main () {
return 0;
}
gives syntax error to me.
Attached there is a little more.
Can you say anything.
My solution was to delete
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.0/include/stdio.h
but is this THE solution?
Anyone can tell me that this is the only "danger
33 matches
Mail list logo
