Eray Ozkural (exa) writes:
> Package: gcc-3.0
> Version: 1:3.0-2
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi gcc people,
>
> I think the expansion of gcc acronym has changed to "gnu compiler
> collection" a long time ago. It's no more called the "gnu c compiler"
> since it supports multiple languages (a
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 1:3.0-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi gcc people,
I think the expansion of gcc acronym has changed to "gnu compiler
collection" a long time ago. It's no more called the "gnu c compiler"
since it supports multiple languages (and many more languages have
been tapping into the fram
Actually, no, I have not tried these packages (I had not apt-get updated
since last night). I will try them, and I am sure that this will fix
the problem.
Thanks for the prompt response!
Jonathan
On 25 Jun 2001 22:07:35 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I assume you did try gcj-3.0-2 on i386, whic
I assume you did try gcj-3.0-2 on i386, which was configured without
threads by accident. Please fetch the -3 packages, which were just
installed in unstable.
Jonathan LaCour writes:
> I am just starting out using GCJ and enjoying it very much, however I
> have run into a problem with the releas
I am just starting out using GCJ and enjoying it very much, however I
have run into a problem with the release of GCJ that is in Debian
unstable. When I attempt to use threads, the program will compile, but
fail with:
libgcj failure: only thread already running
As I understand it, this means
There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libstdc++3_3.0-3_i386.deb: priority is overridden from required to standard.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the package wr
Installing:
gcc-3.0-base_3.0-3_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/gcc-3.0-base_3.0-3_all.deb
fastjar_3.0-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/fastjar_3.0-3_i386.deb
g77-3.0_3.0-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/g77-3.0_3.0-3_i386.deb
g++-3.0_3.0-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/g++-3.0_3.0-3_i38
[Bcc-ed to the list of current maintainers of multi-maintainer
packages I'm aware of]
Hi,
Both katie and dpkg-dev have finally been fixed to support multiple
maintainers properly. To take advantage of this all you need is
dpkg-dev (>= 1.9.14)[1] and to add an 'Uploaders:' field to the first
par
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Matthias Klose wrote:
> funny report. what do you expect? please provide the relevant source
> as documented in /usr/share/doc/gcc-3.0/README.Bugs.gz.
>
> > I'm Gabor Lenart from Hungary and we're developing a movie player software
> > for Linux. We tried to compile and be
funny report. what do you expect? please provide the relevant source
as documented in /usr/share/doc/gcc-3.0/README.Bugs.gz.
Gabor Lenart writes:
> Package: gcc-3.0
> Version: 1:3.0-2
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm Gabor Lenart from Hungary and we're developing a movie player softwa
Your message dated Mon, 25 Jun 2001 19:43:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#102198: libgcc_s.so.0 not found
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Chris, any support in ld needed?
I believe so. I'm working on a new package, but am having problems with
objcopy on at least one platform (segfault). I'll see what I can do about
putting together a new release this week.
C
>
> laurent bonnaud wri
Package: gcj
Version: 2:3.0-4
Severity: important
Tags: sid
> Hello.java << EOF
public class Hello {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("Hello!");
}
}
EOF
/usr/bin/gcj --main=Hello Hello.java
./a.out
./a.out: error while loading shared
package: libstdc++2.10
version: 1:2.95.2-14
yakko:/mount/md0/mirror# cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/libstdc++2.10-dev.prerm
#! /bin/sh -e
if [ \( "$1" = "upgrade" -o "$1" = "remove" \) -a -L /usr/doc/libstdc++2.10-dev
]; then rm -f /usr/doc/libstdc++2.10-dev; fi
install-info --quiet --remove iostream$
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 1:3.0-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
I'm Gabor Lenart from Hungary and we're developing a movie player software
for Linux. We tried to compile and benchmark mplayer (our player) with both
of gcc 3.0 and gcc 2.95. We found out that gcc 3.0 produces SLOWER and BIGGER
code than 2
15 matches
Mail list logo
