Bug#102451: libgcj0-dev doesn't create required docs symlink

Package: libgcj0-dev Version: 2.95.1-5 libgcj0-dev doesn't create the symlink from /usr/doc/libgcj0-dev -> ../share/doc/libgcj0-dev that is required by Debian policy 13.4. This can be demonstrated with a test: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ test ! -L /usr/doc/libgcj0-dev && echo "symbolic link /usr/doc/

Bug#100983: marked as done (gcc-3.0-010613 refuses to compile programs)

Your message dated Tue, 26 Jun 2001 23:22:42 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Processed: has this been fixed? or still there? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #99307 to gcc-gnats as PR 3419

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 99307 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#99307: unresolved symbols when gcj -static is used Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 99307 [PR libgcj/3419] unresolved symbols when gcj -static is used Bug#99307: unres

Processed: has this been fixed? or still there?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 100983 libgcc1 Bug#100983: gcc-3.0-010613 refuses to compile programs Bug reassigned from package `libgcc0' to `libgcc1'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Deb

gcc-defaults override disparity

There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the override file for the following file(s): chill_2.95.4-3_i386.deb: priority is overridden from optional to extra. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong p

gcc-defaults_0.10_i386.changes INSTALLED

Installing: gcc-defaults_0.10.tar.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gcc-defaults_0.10.tar.gz gcc-defaults_0.10.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gcc-defaults_0.10.dsc gpc_2.95.4-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gpc_2.95.4-3_i386.deb gobjc_2.95.4-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gobj

Bug#102353: -fno-bounds-check in combination with -W gives strange message

Package: gcj-3.0 Version: 1:3.0-3 Severity: normal > Hello.java << EOF public class Hello { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("Hello!"); } } EOF gcj -W -fno-bounds-check --main=Hello Hello.java jc1: warning: Ignoring command line option

new gcc-2.95 for unstable

Philip Blundell writes: > The ARM port could use a new upload of gcc-2.95 for unstable. Matthias, do > you have any plan to do one soon? applied some patches yesterday. I'll start a build tonight. Anything else to be included?

new gcc-2.95 for unstable

The ARM port could use a new upload of gcc-2.95 for unstable. Matthias, do you have any plan to do one soon? Thanks p. pgpCIxnGZux39.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: GCC 3.0 status?

Joey Hess writes: > If this does indeed take some time (which sure seems likely), perhaps it > would be a good idea to move the existing gcc-3.0 packages from priority > standard to priority extra in the meantime. As is, they are selected > automatically by dselect, and worse, are being install

Bug#99307: libgcj/3419: unresolved symbols when gcj -static is used

Thank you very much for your problem report. It has the internal identification `libgcj/3419'. The individual assigned to look at your report is: unassigned. >Category: libgcj >Responsible:unassigned >Synopsis: unresolved symbols when gcj -static is used >Arrival-Date: Mon Jun 2