Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #99038 to gcc-gnats as PR 3490

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 99038 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#99038: internal error using static synchronized Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] retitle 99038 [PR java/3490] internal error using static synchronized Bug#99038: internal error

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #102353 to gcc-gnats as PR 3492

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 102353 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#102353: -fno-bounds-check in combination with -W gives strange message Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] retitle 102353 [PR java/3492] -fno-bounds-check in combination with -W

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #85908 to gcc-gnats as PR 3487

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 85908 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#85908: gcc/cpp/stddef.h Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] retitle 85908 [PR preprocessor/3487] unrecognized token before #include points to wrong source Bug#85908:

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #81122 to gcc-gnats as PR 3494

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 81122 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#81122: Internal compiler error (with wrong code, though) Forwarded-to-address changed from gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org to [EMAIL PROTECTED] retitle 81122 [PR c++/3494] Internal compiler error (with wrong code, though)

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #55298 to gcc-gnats as PR 3481

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 55298 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#55298: function attributes should apply to function pointers too Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] retitle 55298 [PR c/3481] function attributes should apply to function

Processed: gcc

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 20695 normal Bug#20695: regparm/profiling breakage (fixed with gcc-3.0) Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#81181: marked as done (gcc: sig 11, reproducible and not machine-specific)

Your message dated Sun, 1 Jul 2001 14:28:56 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed with gcc-2.95.4 and gcc-3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: tagging gcc reports

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 102473 + unreproduceable Unknown tag/s: unreproduceable. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending. Bug#102473: #include_next does not work correctly in std_cstdio.h (and others)

Processed: forwarded gcc bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 100166 gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Bug#100166: gcc-3.0: internal compiler error: unrecognized insn Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Processed: reassign gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 43170 g++-2.95 Bug#43170: [PR 40] Result naming doesn't work for functions defined in a class Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `g++-2.95'. tags 43170 + fixed Bug#43170: [PR 40] Result naming doesn't work for functions defined in a class

Processed: reassign report to gcc

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 84969 gcc Bug#84969: php4 doesn't compile on arm Bug#83550: Stable gcc can't compile PHP4 4.0.3 on arm Bug reassigned from package `php4' to `gcc'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle #84969 [PR target/491] can't compile php4 on arm Bug#84969: php4 doesn't compile on arm Changed Bug title. retitle #83550 [PR target/491] can't compile php4 on arm Bug#83550: Stable gcc can't compile PHP4 4.0.3 on arm Changed Bug title.

weird behaviour when incrementing volatile ints

GNU/Linux) and HEAD 20010701 Environment: System: Debian GNU/Linux (testing/unstable) Architecture: i686 host: i386-linux build: i386-linux target: i386-linux configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,proto,objc --prefix=/usr --infodir=/share/info --mandir

appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on i386

GNU/Linux) and HEAD 20010701 Environment: System: Debian GNU/Linux (testing/unstable) Architecture: i686 host: i386-linux build: i386-linux target: i386-linux configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,proto,objc --prefix=/usr --infodir=/share/info --mandir

builtin memcmp() could be optimised

) and HEAD 20010701 Environment: System: Debian GNU/Linux (testing/unstable) Architecture: i686 host: i386-linux build: i386-linux target: i386-linux configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,proto,objc --prefix=/usr --infodir=/share/info --mandir=/share/man --enable

Inlined strlen() could be smarter

) and HEAD 20010701 Environment: System: Debian GNU/Linux (testing/unstable) Architecture: i686 host: i386-linux build: i386-linux target: i386-linux configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,proto,objc --prefix=/usr --infodir=/share/info --mandir=/share/man --enable

Re: the Drepper thread

Ben Collins writes: On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 12:09:11PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: I see that we do not have the patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-06/msg00748.html applied in the Debian packages. The other patch mentioned comes from the branch. I thought we had the

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #88959 to gcc-gnats as PR 3513

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 88959 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#88959: gcc: GCC doesn't merge substrings Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] retitle 88959 [PR optimization/3513]: GCC doesn't merge substrings Bug#88959: gcc: GCC doesn't merge

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #85535 to gcc-gnats as PR 3508

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 85535 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#85535: gcc: builtin memcmp() could be optimised Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] retitle 85535 [PR optimization/3508]: builtin memcmp() could be optimised Bug#85535: gcc:

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #75773 to gcc-gnats as PR 3507

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 75773 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#75773: gcc: appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on i386 Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] retitle 75773 [PR optimization/3507]: appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on i386

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #85445 to gcc-gnats as PR 3504

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 85445 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#85445: gcc: __alignof__ not working correctly Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] retitle 85445 [PR c/3504]: __alignof__ not working correctly Bug#85445: gcc: __alignof__ not

Processed: reassign g++ bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 21255 g++-2.95 Bug#21255: g++ has some troubles with nested templates Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `g++-2.95'. tags 21255 + fixed Bug#21255: g++ has some troubles with nested templates Tags added: fixed retitle 21255 [fixed in 3.0]

Re: GCC vs GLIBC: why this stance, Drepper ?!?

On Sun, 1 Jul 2001 12:02:18 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 03:41:28PM -0700, Justin Guyett wrote: rh gcc 2.96 snapshot. Does the 2.95.4 snapshot used by debian have those two patches in it? I believe they have the atexit patch, it is in CVS after all. Dunno about the

Bug#103051: fastjar: Please include man page

Package: fastjar Version: 1:3.0-3 Severity: normal Hi. Would it be possible to add a man page for fastjar? Thanks - Ben. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux emerald 2.4.4-686 #1 Sun Apr 29 12:22:40 EST 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C