Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 103980 normal
Bug#103980: g++-3.0: copies constructors
Severity set to `normal'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 1:3.0-0pre010427
Severity: wishlist
Here's another segment that needs to have an assembler optimiser run over it:
int foo(char c) {
if (c !(c 0x80)) {
a();
} else {
b();
}
}
produces with -O2:
0: 55
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 1:3.0-0pre010403
Severity: wishlist
I suggest these grammar and spelling fixes. Note that it's is always
a contraction standing for it is. The possessive form is its.
Isn't English great? :-)
- Jim Van Zandt
--- README.Debian-orig Sun Jul 15
Submitter-Id: ?
Originator:Franck Branjonneau
Organization:
Confidential: no
Synopsis: GCC gives an ICE instead of reporting an error.
Severity: non-critical
Priority: ?
Category: c++
Class: ice-on-illegal-code
Release: 3.0 (Debian) (Debian
Package: g++-3.0
Version: 1:3.0-4
Severity: normal
Consider the attached source file. When trying to compile this, I get:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ g++-3.0 -O -c segfault.cc
| g++-3.0: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program as)
| Please submit a full bug report.
| See
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 08:38:42PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
IMO, this is incorrect. The ('s) is always used for showing plural and
possesive on things like API's or 80's. It just doesn't make sense
without it.
Then again, I never cared much for the language part of english class :)
No, we aren't talking about nouns, we are talking about acronyms. The above
does not pertain to this use.
An acronym is still a noun. (And 80s isn't an acroynm, anyway.)
p.
pgpU4M3HJgHOm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 09:21:17PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
No, we aren't talking about nouns, we are talking about acronyms. The above
does not pertain to this use.
An acronym is still a noun. (And 80s isn't an acroynm, anyway.)
It's used as a noun, but the same rules do not apply,
reassign 105384 binutils
thanks
That's the assembler crashing
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 09:22:25PM +0200, Sebastian Rittau wrote:
Package: g++-3.0
Version: 1:3.0-4
Severity: normal
Consider the attached source file. When trying to compile this, I get:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ g++-3.0 -O
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 105384 binutils
Bug#105384: Segfault involving templates, std::string, and exceptions
Bug reassigned from package `g++-3.0' to `binutils'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
10 matches
Mail list logo
