Martin v. Loewis wrote:
I think so. I fail to see the bug in your report, though. Your code is
illegal (or, rather, ill-formed - some GNU coding style advises us not
to claim that you are breaking the law by writing the code).
template class _TW, class _TTWO
struct SGBMb : public SGBb _TW
Package: libstdc++2.10
Version: 1:2.95.2-14
We just discovered the fact that the .deb version of this package in
woody/testing is 1:2.95.2-14, while both sid/unstable and potato/stable
contain 1:2.95.2-13. (Visit e.g.
Hi,
I tested again with
ii g++-3.0 3.0.1-0pre010811The GNU C++ compiler.
and the bug is fixed.
Thanks !
---BeginMessage---
Synopsis: internal error at compiling a c++ source file
State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
State-Changed-By: rodrigc
State-Changed-When: Sun Aug 12
Your message dated Thu, 16 Aug 2001 21:46:30 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#101732: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: optimization/3279: internal
error at compiling a c++ source file
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:13:21 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gcc-2.95 generates bad STABS info on Alpha
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:14:34 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line New patch allows compilation on alpha
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
6 matches
Mail list logo
