On 2 Nov 2001, Brian Nelson wrote:
> I've been trying out gcc-3.0 (3.0.2) with some little Qt apps that I
> wrote. The code compiles fine, but fails with tons of undefined
> references Qwhatever objects when trying to link.
>
> All is well, however, when linking with 2.95.4.
>
> What's the pro
I've been trying out gcc-3.0 (3.0.2) with some little Qt apps that I
wrote. The code compiles fine, but fails with tons of undefined
references Qwhatever objects when trying to link.
All is well, however, when linking with 2.95.4.
What's the problem? Do I need to rebuild the qt libs with 3.0 to
Package: g++-3.0
Version: 3.0.2-10
This error is preventing ftpgrab from compiling on hppa. The test
cases below do not exhibit the same behavior on ia64.
fgfilegrab.cc:75: choosing `char FGString::operator[](unsigned int) const' over
`operator[]'
fgfilegrab.cc:75: because worst conversion f
> When compiling the same programs with these compilers, g++ 2.95 is
> much (sometimes 3 times) faster than g++ 3.0, even without
> optimizing (without -O).
Not sure what you asking. Are you saying g++ 2.95 is faster, or that
the generated code is faster?
> Why is it happening? Is it so because o
Hello all.
When compiling the same programs with these compilers, g++ 2.95 is much
(sometimes 3 times) faster than g++ 3.0, even without optimizing (without -O).
Why is it happening? Is it so because of more complex templates in recent
libstdc++?
Is g++ 3.0 really a step further ?
Regards,
Alex
5 matches
Mail list logo