What I do not understand is why the compiler does _not_ find
ambiguity when the C++ class header is slimmed down to just the
necessary parts: the operator overload and a constructor.
Because you've removed the ambiguity in simple.h. If you add the line
operator const char*()const;
back
Package: gcc272
Version: 2.7.2.3-18
Severity: grave
Since unstable/testing does no longer include kernel 2.0.x (and these
kernels won't work with the modutils in unstable/testing) it's in
my opinion time to remove gcc272 from unstable.
I've set the severity to be RC so that this doesn't be
That makes sense, thanks. That's the key piece I was missing.
--
John R. DailyProgeny Linux Systems
Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Master of the ephemeral epiphany
Hello, maintainers.
I don't know what the package has the bug, so I write to 3 maintainers
(packages: menu, dwww, libstdc++3-doc).
I have the following versions of these packages installed on my system:
ii menu 2.1.5-10 provides update-menus functions for some app
ii dwww
4 matches
Mail list logo
