Package: g++
Version: 1:2.95.3-7
Severity: normal
Hi,
I just found out that some of the symbols pulled in from libgcc.a have odd
behaviour. If I write a simple program (foo.cc) like this:
int main()
{
int *x = new int;
return 0;
}
Package: fastjar
Version: 1:3.0.2-0pre010922
Severity: wishlist
Using /etc/alternatives for the name 'jar' would be nice.
Quoting from the "Proposed Debian Java Policy"
(http://people.debian.org/~bortz/Java/policy.html): "(...) Java
compilers _must_ provide java-compiler and depe
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 02:09:58PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: gcc272
> Version: 2.7.2.3-18
> Severity: grave
>
>
> Since unstable/testing does no longer include kernel 2.0.x (and these
> kernels won't work with the modutils in unstable/testing) it's in
> my opinion time to remove gcc272
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Matthias Klose wrote:
> hmm, I was under the impression, that enabling -fuse-cxa-atexit as the
> default on a glibc-2.2 based system, was safe.
>
> You get the code you want with -fno-use-cxa-atexit. Should we revert
> this change?
After analyzing the problem it became clear
On Tue, 06 Nov 2001 at 14:09:58 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Since unstable/testing does no longer include kernel 2.0.x (and these
> kernels won't work with the modutils in unstable/testing) it's in
> my opinion time to remove gcc272 from unstable.
It's worth noting that there are still 12 packages
5 matches
Mail list logo
