Bug#118670: g++: libgcc.a symbols end up exported by shared libraries

2001-11-07 Thread Avery Pennarun
Package: g++ Version: 1:2.95.3-7 Severity: normal Hi, I just found out that some of the symbols pulled in from libgcc.a have odd behaviour. If I write a simple program (foo.cc) like this: int main() { int *x = new int; return 0; }

Bug#118648: Please use /etc/alternatives for the name 'jar'

2001-11-07 Thread Daniel Serodio
Package: fastjar Version: 1:3.0.2-0pre010922 Severity: wishlist Using /etc/alternatives for the name 'jar' would be nice. Quoting from the "Proposed Debian Java Policy" (http://people.debian.org/~bortz/Java/policy.html): "(...) Java compilers _must_ provide java-compiler and depe

Bug#118477: gcc272 should be removed from unstable/testing

2001-11-07 Thread Aaron Lehmann
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 02:09:58PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: gcc272 > Version: 2.7.2.3-18 > Severity: grave > > > Since unstable/testing does no longer include kernel 2.0.x (and these > kernels won't work with the modutils in unstable/testing) it's in > my opinion time to remove gcc272

Bug#116823: Debian's g++-3.0 forgets to generate some code.

2001-11-07 Thread Richard B. Kreckel
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Matthias Klose wrote: > hmm, I was under the impression, that enabling -fuse-cxa-atexit as the > default on a glibc-2.2 based system, was safe. > > You get the code you want with -fno-use-cxa-atexit. Should we revert > this change? After analyzing the problem it became clear

Bug#118477: gcc272 should be removed from unstable/testing

2001-11-07 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, 06 Nov 2001 at 14:09:58 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Since unstable/testing does no longer include kernel 2.0.x (and these > kernels won't work with the modutils in unstable/testing) it's in > my opinion time to remove gcc272 from unstable. It's worth noting that there are still 12 packages