Re: [parisc-linux] hppa gcc bug?

2001-11-12 Thread Alan Modra
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 04:07:12PM -0800, Randolph Chung wrote: Looks like there's a strength-reduce optimization bug in g++-3.0.2 on hppa For those reading this on gcc-patches, there's a .ii at http://lists.parisc-linux.org/pipermail/parisc-linux/2001-November/014491.html This is with

help needed: does the current gcc-3.0 package build on the hurd?

2001-11-12 Thread Matthias Klose
The current gcc-3.0 package in unstable has libffi enabled for the Hurd. Does libffi build on the Hurd, or should libffi disabled again? Thanks, Matthias

Processed: Re: Bug#117513: openc++: segfault or Error 139 compiling anything, even empty file

2001-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 117513 g++-2.95 Bug#117513: openc++: segfault or Error 139 compiling anything, even empty file Bug reassigned from package `openc++' to `g++-2.95'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham

Bug#119386: libgcj2 includes /usr/bin/gij-3.0

2001-11-12 Thread Adam Heath
Package: libgcj2 Severity: serious Library packages should not include binaries. Please see policy section 11.3. ... If your package has some run-time support programs which use the shared library you must not put them in the shared library package. If you do that then you won't be able to

Bug#119384: New on the list - java on debian?

2001-11-12 Thread Adam Heath
Package: libgcj2 On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Per Bothner wrote: Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: apt-get install java-virtual-machine This will list all available packages providing a JVM. I trust gcj/libgcj is so listed? (I'm not running Debian on my own machines so I can't check easily.) If it

Bug#119064: gcc-3.0: doesn't depend on gcc

2001-11-12 Thread Phil Edwards
All the foo-3.0 packages don't depend, recommend or even suggest the foo packages making it possible (especially on hppa where -3.0 is the default compiler) to install just gcc-3.0 and not have a gcc symlink which is probably not a good thing? The 'gcc' package is hardcoded to gcc-2.95 right