Processed: reassign gcc bug to gpc

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 123067 gpc-2.95 Bug#123067: gcc: Rebuild of gcc 1:2.95.2-13 from source with extra CFLAGS causes Internal compiler error (gpc1 coredumps) Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `gpc-2.95'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#122955: ICE: unrecognizable insn while compiling kernel

J.H.M.Dassen writes: Package: gcc-3.0 Version: 1:3.0.2-4 Severity: normal When compiling 2.4.17-pre6: gcc-3.0 -D__KERNEL__ -I/extra/localsrc/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe

Bug#123067: gcc: Rebuild of gcc 1:2.95.2-13 from source with extra CFLAGS causes Internal compiler error (gpc1 coredumps)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Subject: gcc: Rebuild of gcc 1:2.95.2-13 from source with extra CFLAGS causes Internal compiler error (gpc1 coredumps) Package: gcc Version: 1:2.95.2-13 please retry with the current gcc-2.95 from testing/unstable (2.95.4).

Bug#123067: gcc: Rebuild of gcc 1:2.95.2-13 from source with extra CFLAGS causes Internal compiler error (gpc1 coredumps)

On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 14:52:55 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Subject: gcc: Rebuild of gcc 1:2.95.2-13 from source with extra CFLAGS causes Internal compiler error (gpc1 coredumps) Package: gcc Version: 1:2.95.2-13 please retry with the current gcc-2.95 from

Bug#122955: marked as done (ICE: unrecognizable insn while compiling kernel)

Your message dated Sun, 9 Dec 2001 16:59:22 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#122955: ICE: unrecognizable insn while compiling kernel has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#123067: marked as done (gcc: Rebuild of gcc 1:2.95.2-13 from source with extra CFLAGS causes Internal compiler error (gpc1 coredumps))

Your message dated Sun, 9 Dec 2001 17:23:31 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line not the case with gpc-2.95.4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

help needed for libstdc++2.10 reports

I should not patch libstdc++ myself :-( This is the offending patch, introduced to resolve a severe performance problem compared to gcc-2.95.2. See #92524 and #100571. http://bugs.debian.org/92524 http://bugs.debian.org/100571 --- src-native/libstdc++/sstream~ Tue

gcc-defaults_0.16_i386.changes INSTALLED

Installing: chill_2.95.4-9_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/chill_2.95.4-9_i386.deb cpp_2.95.4-9_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_2.95.4-9_i386.deb g++_2.95.4-9_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_2.95.4-9_i386.deb g77_2.95.4-9_i386.deb to

gcc-3.0_3.0.3ds0-0pre011209_i386.changes INSTALLED

Installing: cpp-3.0-doc_3.0.3-0pre011209_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/cpp-3.0-doc_3.0.3-0pre011209_all.deb cpp-3.0_3.0.3-0pre011209_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/cpp-3.0_3.0.3-0pre011209_i386.deb fastjar_3.0.3-0pre011209_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/fastjar_3.0.3-0pre011209_i386.deb

Fixed in NMU of gcc-3.0 1:3.0.3ds0-0pre011209

tag 121924 + fixed tag 122547 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 09:36:48 +0100 Source: gcc-3.0 Binary: gcc-3.0-sparc64

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gcc-3.0 1:3.0.3ds0-0pre011209

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 121924 + fixed Bug#121924: serious gcc bug on ia64 Tags added: fixed tag 122547 + fixed Bug#122547: [gcc-3.0] cc1plus segfault in strength reduction Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#122735: marked as done (gcc-defaults need to reer to gobjc-3.0 for ia64)

Your message dated Sun, 09 Dec 2001 15:02:00 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#122735: fixed in gcc-defaults 0.16 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#122547: marked as done ([gcc-3.0] cc1plus segfault in strength reduction)

Your message dated Sun, 9 Dec 2001 22:09:37 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0 (3.0.3-0pre011209) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#121924: marked as done (serious gcc bug on ia64)

Your message dated Sun, 9 Dec 2001 22:09:37 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-3.0 (3.0.3-0pre011209) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#123155: gcc-3.0 does not build on PPC

Package: gcc-3.0 Version: 1:3.0.3ds0-0pre011209 Severity: serious /build/buildd/gcc-3.0-3.0.3ds0/build/gcc/xgcc -B/build/buildd/gcc-3.0-3.0.3ds0/build/gcc/ -nostdinc++ -L /build/buildd/gcc-3.0-3.0.3ds0/build/powerpc-linux/libstdc++-v3/src -L/build/buildd/gcc-3.0-3.0.3ds0/bui

Internal compiler error when compiling Palm OS Emulator version 3.3

Submitter-Id: net Originator:Jens Kerle Organization: Confidential: no Synopsis: Internal compiler error when compiling Palm OS Emulator version 3.3 Severity: non-critical Priority: low Category: c++ Class: ice-on-legal-code Release: 3.0.2 (Debian) (Debian