On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 07:37:45AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
[CC to Franz]
Dan, I missed to include the libgcc-powerpc patch (in rules.patch)
from Franz Sirl:
as recently noted, for --enabled-shared --disable-multilib configurations
we currently don't build the shared libgcc with
At 07:44 10.12.2001, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 07:37:45AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
[CC to Franz]
Dan, I missed to include the libgcc-powerpc patch (in rules.patch)
from Franz Sirl:
as recently noted, for --enabled-shared --disable-multilib
configurations
we
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Franz Sirl wrote:
No, that isn't the problem, Alan Modra broke it with his obvious patch ;-).
Oops, sorry. I should have pressed harder to move the simplified (and
corrected!) 3.1 rs6000_unique_section over to the branch. That
horrible section index
Egregio Signore,
mi permetto di disturbarLa per fornirLe alcune
informazioni riguardanti
i servizi internet oggi presenti sul mercato.
Navigando sulla rete mi sono accorto che i costi, per pubblicare e
mantenere un sito aziendale o personale, sono ancora molto elevati
rispetto alla qualita'
At 13:43 10.12.2001, Alan Modra wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Franz Sirl wrote:
No, that isn't the problem, Alan Modra broke it with his obvious
patch ;-).
Oops, sorry. I should have pressed harder to move the simplified (and
corrected!) 3.1 rs6000_unique_section over to
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 03:12:59PM +0100, Franz Sirl wrote:
What do you think about my patch? Avoiding code duplication is a good thing
in my eyes :-).
I quite like it, but it should probably go on mainline first, with the
mainline change I made moved onto the branch to fix the bug.
Geoff?
6 matches
Mail list logo