Bug#123155: gcc-3.0 does not build on PPC

2001-12-10 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 07:37:45AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: [CC to Franz] Dan, I missed to include the libgcc-powerpc patch (in rules.patch) from Franz Sirl: as recently noted, for --enabled-shared --disable-multilib configurations we currently don't build the shared libgcc with

Bug#123155: gcc-3.0 does not build on PPC

2001-12-10 Thread Franz Sirl
At 07:44 10.12.2001, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 07:37:45AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: [CC to Franz] Dan, I missed to include the libgcc-powerpc patch (in rules.patch) from Franz Sirl: as recently noted, for --enabled-shared --disable-multilib configurations we

Bug#123155: gcc-3.0 does not build on PPC

2001-12-10 Thread Alan Modra
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Franz Sirl wrote: No, that isn't the problem, Alan Modra broke it with his obvious patch ;-). Oops, sorry. I should have pressed harder to move the simplified (and corrected!) 3.1 rs6000_unique_section over to the branch. That horrible section index

Informazioni sui servizi internet a basso costo presenti sul mercato

2001-12-10 Thread Flavio Boeris
Egregio Signore, mi permetto di disturbarLa per fornirLe alcune informazioni riguardanti i servizi internet oggi presenti sul mercato. Navigando sulla rete mi sono accorto che i costi, per pubblicare e mantenere un sito aziendale o personale, sono ancora molto elevati rispetto alla qualita'

Bug#123155: gcc-3.0 does not build on PPC

2001-12-10 Thread Franz Sirl
At 13:43 10.12.2001, Alan Modra wrote: On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Franz Sirl wrote: No, that isn't the problem, Alan Modra broke it with his obvious patch ;-). Oops, sorry. I should have pressed harder to move the simplified (and corrected!) 3.1 rs6000_unique_section over to

Bug#123155: gcc-3.0 does not build on PPC

2001-12-10 Thread Alan Modra
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 03:12:59PM +0100, Franz Sirl wrote: What do you think about my patch? Avoiding code duplication is a good thing in my eyes :-). I quite like it, but it should probably go on mainline first, with the mainline change I made moved onto the branch to fix the bug. Geoff?