Re: Bug#126703: g++-3.0: defines _GNU_SOURCE with g++-3.0

2001-12-30 Thread Phil Edwards
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 01:38:06AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Martin v. Loewis writes: > > > > I can't see a reason for libstdc++ requiring _GNU_SOURCE except for the > > > > desire to re-export symbols in std::, for which I would propose a > > > > different strategy. > > > > > > It would help

Re: Bug#126703: g++-3.0: defines _GNU_SOURCE with g++-3.0

2001-12-30 Thread Matthias Klose
Martin v. Loewis writes: > > > I can't see a reason for libstdc++ requiring _GNU_SOURCE except for the > > > desire to re-export symbols in std::, for which I would propose a > > > different strategy. > > > > It would help to know why this was done in the first place; there could be > > other reas

Re: Bug#126703: g++-3.0: defines _GNU_SOURCE with g++-3.0

2001-12-30 Thread Martin v. Loewis
> > I can't see a reason for libstdc++ requiring _GNU_SOURCE except for the > > desire to re-export symbols in std::, for which I would propose a > > different strategy. > > It would help to know why this was done in the first place; there could be > other reasons. Sure, that could be possible. A

Re: Bug#126703: g++-3.0: defines _GNU_SOURCE with g++-3.0

2001-12-30 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 10:26:39AM +0100, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > > > That would remove the need to define _GNU_SOURCE in the command line. > > > > There are other related problems, such as #108663. It seems that > > _GNU_SOURCE is required anyway when using g++-3.0. > > Well, I'm proposing t

Bug#127111: libgcj2: missing symoblic link

2001-12-30 Thread Matthias Klose
Paul J. Keenan writes: > Package: libgcj2 > Version: 1:3.0.3-1 > Severity: normal > > /usr/bin/gcj is a link to /usr/bin/gcj-3.0, so shouldn't there > be a link /usr/bin/gij, linked to /usr/bin/gij-3.0 ? yes, it's in the gij package.

Bug#127111: libgcj2: missing symoblic link

2001-12-30 Thread Paul J. Keenan
Package: libgcj2 Version: 1:3.0.3-1 Severity: normal /usr/bin/gcj is a link to /usr/bin/gcj-3.0, so shouldn't there be a link /usr/bin/gij, linked to /usr/bin/gij-3.0 ? -- paul -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux funkiest 2.4.17 #1 Thu Dec 27 01:46:21 GMT

Bug#122955: Bug 122955: short status report

2001-12-30 Thread Rainer Ellinger
Matthias Klose wrote: I am using debian/woody with up to date packages from debian.org: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] please retest with the current gcc-3.0 (3.0.3-1) package from unstable. I don't like to mess up my woody with unstable packages. With woody and gcc 3.02 ich get the reported bug. I verifi

Re: Bug#126703: g++-3.0: defines _GNU_SOURCE with g++-3.0

2001-12-30 Thread Martin v. Loewis
> > That would remove the need to define _GNU_SOURCE in the command line. > > There are other related problems, such as #108663. It seems that > _GNU_SOURCE is required anyway when using g++-3.0. Well, I'm proposing to fix the dependency of libstdc++ to require _GNU_SOURCE (which is passed throu