On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 04:01:45PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
summary
---
All binutils seem to build happily
Gcc's are a lot more of a problem
Nice going!
OK - so most of these look like they are after bits of libc and
associated stuff; is it appropriate to use dpkg-cross
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 14:31:04 +0300
ALEXANDER SHISHCKIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AS I got trouble when upgrading from GCC 2.95 to 3.0.3.
AS None of the programs are working with it saying that
AS GNU C compiler can make binaries or so.
AS Where can I get info on fixing this?
Please describe your
Package: gcc-2.95
Version: 1:2.95.4-1
Severity: important
Translated messages of gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95/g++-2.95/g77-2.95 is not
displayed well. All non-ASCII characters are replaced with ?
(question mark).
For example,
$ LANG=C gcc-2.95 foobar
gcc-2.95: foobar: No such file or directory
gcc-2.95:
Note that this problem is fixed in gcc-3.0 but I think
gcc-2.95 is important because it is the main C compiler
for Woody.
How many translations are there available for gcc-2.95? Please send a
patch, if you think, it's important. IMO it would be better to
concentrate on translations for the
Since we will have to prepare Woody's release soon, I think
the best way is to disable translation just now tempolarily
and then start the investigation of this problem.
I recommend the same thing. Gettext support in gcc 2.95 is known not
to work; the GCC maintainers even claim that it is
5 matches
Mail list logo
