Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 133199 rplay-client: rplaydsp doesn't pass arguments correctly and
> more
Bug#133199: [PR c/5597] Initialization of flexible char array member sefgaults
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 131399 [PR c/5597] Initialization of flexible char array memb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 131399 upstream
Bug#131399: gcc-3.0: Initialization of flexible char array member sefgaults
Tags added: upstream
> forwarded 131399 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#131399: gcc-3.0: Initialization of flexible char array member sefgaults
Noted your statement
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 133433 pending
Bug#133433: gcc-3.0: FUBAR on !i386, new arch any gcc-3.0-base is not built
Tags added: pending
> tags 133435 pending
Bug#133435: [Fwd: [Patch] (3.0.4pre, arm) : get libstdc++ working]
Tags added: pending
> tags 133435 upstream
Bug
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Scott Venier wrote:
> That's a bit of a broad statement in the subject line, so let me clairify
> a bit. gcc 2.95.4 on alpha has some pretty nasty bugs. Because of those
> bugs, it can't build many parts of the linux kernel. Some of the problems
> are in device drivers (th
Hi!
> > In its previous incarnation, bug was hidden by going to new gcc
> > version... But it looks like it only raised a bar a bit.
>
> This is really a bug in your code; you are exceeding a compiler limit,
> thus the code behaves undefined. There is a bug in the compiler also:
> the compiler sh
Hello.
That's a bit of a broad statement in the subject line, so let me clairify
a bit. gcc 2.95.4 on alpha has some pretty nasty bugs. Because of those
bugs, it can't build many parts of the linux kernel. Some of the problems
are in device drivers (the adaptec 2940 driver is one, DAC960 anothe
6 matches
Mail list logo