Your message dated Mon, 04 Mar 2002 20:02:16 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#136359: fixed in gcc-2.95 2.95.4.ds9-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 04 Mar 2002 20:02:16 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#130394: fixed in gcc-2.95 2.95.4.ds9-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 04 Mar 2002 20:02:16 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#129573: fixed in gcc-2.95 2.95.4.ds9-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Accepted:
chill-2.95_2.95.4-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/chill-2.95_2.95.4-3_i386.deb
cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-3_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-3_all.deb
cpp-2.95_2.95.4-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95_2.95.4-3_i386.deb
g++-2.95_2.95.4-3_i386.deb
to pool/m
Your message dated Mon, 4 Mar 2002 20:34:15 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#135817: gcc/g++ from gcc-snapshot do not work on hppa
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 3.0.4ds3-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Attached is an updated hppa-build.dpatch that fixes two bugs:
1. large switch statements were not being compiled properly
2. fp arguments were not being passed correctly to indirect calls
Both of these patches came from J David
6 matches
Mail list logo