John David Anglin writes:
While preparing gcc-3.1 packages I noticed many eh-related regressions
fixed in the trunk, when dwarf2 support was added. With Dave's
guidance I made a diff of the pa subdirectory from the trunk and
applied it to the branch. Although many FAILS are gone, there are
Jeff Bailey writes:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 12:44:45AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Considering the confusion of having gcc272 as default C compiler
and egcs as default C++ compiler in slink and the arch by arch
switch to new compiler versions, I would propose to switch all
Recipient of the infected attachment: Jan Spurny\Inbox
Subject of the message: FREE!
One or more attachments were deleted
Attachment target.pif was Deleted for the following reasons:
Virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] was found.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
this is a diff of the test results for b and c. g++ is worse, the
I think all the new g++ fails are in new tests. So, I don't think
g++ is actually worse.
regressions for g77 and gcc are new test cases in the trunk. One new
gcc regression:
Yes, gcc.c-torture/compile/2504-1.c is a
John David Anglin writes:
Thanks. Could you try the following patch, please?
yes, allows the bootstrap.
--- 5ntaprop.adb.~1.3.~ Sun Mar 17 09:08:21 2002
+++ 5ntaprop.adb Sun Apr 28 22:42:59 2002
@@ -45,9 +45,6 @@
-- used for Ada_Task_Control_Block
-- Task_ID
Matthias Klose wrote:
Sm9obiBEYXZpZCBBbmdsaW4gd3JpdGVzOg0KPiA+IFdoaWxlIHByZXBhcmluZyBnY2MtMy4x
IHBhY2thZ2VzIEkgbm90aWNlZCBtYW55IGVoLXJlbGF0ZWQgcmVncmVzc2lvbnMNCj4gPiBm
...
Matthias (and others),
base64 encoded email doesn't archive well:
6 matches
Mail list logo
