Re: preprocessor/7558: preprocessor option -MM has change semantic

Martin, If it's a system header, why are you lying to the compiler? Maybe a real-life example and not a.h would help. Neil.

Re: preprocessor/7558: preprocessor option -MM has change semantic

Martin v. Loewis wrote:- Neil Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If it's a system header, why are you lying to the compiler? I'm not lying, I use a.h You've not told the compiler it's a system header, so it doesn't think it is. Let me see what Zack thinks. Neil.

Processed: Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl/maxima on hppa

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 146070 gcc-3.1 Bug#146070: gcl_2.5.0.cvs20020429-2(hppa/unstable): doesn't recognize hppa-linux Bug reassigned from package `gcl' to `gcc-3.1'. reassign 151886 gcc-3.1 Bug#151886: maxima_5.6a-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: needs porting work for

gcc-3.2_3.2ds0-0pre3_hppa.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-3.2_3.2-0pre3_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2-0pre3_hppa.deb fastjar_3.2-0pre3_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/fastjar_3.2-0pre3_hppa.deb fixincludes_3.2-0pre3_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/fixincludes_3.2-0pre3_hppa.deb g++-3.2_3.2-0pre3_hppa.deb to

Re: How to get Debian to gcc-3.2 ....

Jan, There definitely will be an issue with rebuilding glibc against either gcc 3.1.1 or 3.2 on at least two, if not more, arches. The problems arise from the change in gcc 3.1 which makes libgcc symbols .hidden now. This means that if you rebuild the current glibc 2.2.5-13 with gcc 3.1.1/3.2,