On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:18:01AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
# of expected passes5176
# of unexpected failures1114
# of expected failures 977
# of untested testcases 15
# of unsupported tests 3
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:10:08AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:18:01AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
# of expected passes5176
# of unexpected failures1114
# of expected failures 977
# of
try
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -- ...
It would probably work.
Unfortunately, I used dpkg-buildpackage only because my first build
attempt failed. I generally use:
fakeroot apt-get -b source gcc-3.2
which would have the same problem with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
Therefore I think that
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:06:51AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:10:08AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:18:01AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
# of expected passes5176
# of unexpected
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:06:51AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:10:08AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:18:01AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
# of expected passes5176
# of unexpected
James Troup writes:
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.1ds0-0pre1
Severity: serious
Justification: evil doko made python2.2-dev depend on g++-3.2 :-P
who to ask to change my login? maybe 'devil' ;-)
Phil, the buildd lists a successful build. why no upload?
Matthias
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
James Troup writes:
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.1ds0-0pre1
Severity: serious
Justification: evil doko made python2.2-dev depend on g++-3.2 :-P
who to ask to change my login? maybe 'devil' ;-)
Phil, the buildd lists a successful build.
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:08:07PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 03:35:11PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:23:40PM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
We have to consider __dso_handle and __cxa_atexit separately. For
__dso_handle, can you tell
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.1ds0-0pre1
Severity: normal
Trying to build GCC 3.2 (using GCC 3.0.4 experimental) on the NetBSD/i386
port with MAKEFLAGS=-j2 set (the -d flag is used to cope with the fact
that it is a new port and some things are still in progress; the package
builds fine if the
9 matches
Mail list logo