Re: Gcc 3.2 64-bit mode on Sparc?

2002-09-09 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:12:09PM -0500, Roy Bixler wrote: > On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 09:46:56PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Roy Bixler writes: > > > I am running Sid and have recently been compiling many kernels in an > > > effort to get the 'ncpfs' filesystem to work on the Ultrasparc. Usin

Re: Gcc 3.2 64-bit mode on Sparc?

2002-09-09 Thread Roy Bixler
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 09:46:56PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Roy Bixler writes: > > I am running Sid and have recently been compiling many kernels in an > > effort to get the 'ncpfs' filesystem to work on the Ultrasparc. Using > > the egcs64 package works for kernel 2.4.19 but it chokes on >

Re: Gcc 3.2 64-bit mode on Sparc?

2002-09-09 Thread Matthias Klose
Roy Bixler writes: > I am running Sid and have recently been compiling many kernels in an > effort to get the 'ncpfs' filesystem to work on the Ultrasparc. Using > the egcs64 package works for kernel 2.4.19 but it chokes on > 2.4.20-pre5 with an internal compilation error. I then tried to > compi

Bug#157130: gcc 2.96 ICE

2002-09-09 Thread Randolph Chung
In reference to a message from Aaron Lehmann, dated Sep 07: > Maybe this is because gcc 2.96 is not an official release of gcc and > instead is a buggy snapshot? ia64 uses 2.96 as default as a compromise for many issues. we knew from the beginning that it's not an official release of gcc; but call

Gcc 3.2 64-bit mode on Sparc?

2002-09-09 Thread Roy Bixler
I am running Sid and have recently been compiling many kernels in an effort to get the 'ncpfs' filesystem to work on the Ultrasparc. Using the egcs64 package works for kernel 2.4.19 but it chokes on 2.4.20-pre5 with an internal compilation error. I then tried to compile the kernel with gcc-3.2, b

Bug#160175: gcc-3.2: missing message catalogs

2002-09-09 Thread Matthias Klose
YAMASHITA Junji writes: > Package: gcc-3.2 > Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre1 > Severity: normal > > gcc-3.1 package included message catalogs. > But gcc-3.2 package seems to miss them. > > gcc-3.2 is built with `-enable-nls' configure option, > so I think this is bug. gcc-3.2 (1:3.2ds0-0pre2) unstable; u