I think we should reconsider not backporting the patches for bison 1.50
to the 3.2 branch.
OK; let's reconsider. Please point me at the patches.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CodeSourcery, LLChttp://www.codesourcery.com
Mark Mitchell writes:
I think we should reconsider not backporting the patches for bison 1.50
to the 3.2 branch.
OK; let's reconsider. Please point me at the patches.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-10/msg00787.html
I discovered my peoblem trying to use ncurses. My test
code compiles fine with the -c option, butwont link. I get an undefined
reference error message. On a hunch I tried another area of the libraries an
wrote another test using the math.h functions. Consider the
following:
#include stdio.h
--On Monday, October 21, 2002 10:18:06 AM +0200 Matthias Klose
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Mitchell writes:
I think we should reconsider not backporting the patches for bison 1.50
to the 3.2 branch.
OK; let's reconsider. Please point me at the patches.
**
Ceci n'est pas un spam. pour retirez votre courriel de la liste:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sujet : remove + votre adresse
***
Bonjour,
Aujourd'hui je vous écris pour vous
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre4
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source
apt-get build-dep gcc-3.2
Reading Package Lists... Done Building
Dependency Tree... Done
E: Build-Depends dependency on gcc-3.2 cannot be satisfied because the
package libc6.1-dev cannot be
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre4
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source
apt-get build-dep gcc-3.2
Reading Package Lists... Done Building
Dependency Tree... Done
E: Build-Depends dependency on gcc-3.2 cannot be satisfied because the
package libc6.1-dev
Yann Dirson writes:
I have several packages (e2fsprogs, bigloo) that fail to build on
m68k, apparently due to one or more gcc bug(s). Maybe that's the same
as #146006, and #89023, but I can't tell that myself.
Madkiss suggested forcing the use of gcc-3.2. But if this compiler is
tags 165110 + wontfix
reassign 165110 gcc-2.95
retitle 165110 [fixed in gcc-3.x] undocumented option -pthread
thanks
fork __ writes:
Package: gcc
Version: 2.95.4-11
In the man page of gcc(1), the option -pthread is not described.
Here is the description from the freebsd project :
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 165110 + wontfix
Bug#165110: undocumented option -pthread
Tags added: wontfix
reassign 165110 gcc-2.95
Bug#165110: undocumented option -pthread
Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `gcc-2.95'.
retitle 165110 [fixed in gcc-3.x] undocumented
tags 164588 + moreinfo
thanks
- please recheck with gcc-3.2_3.2.1-0pre4 (from unstable)
- please attach the preprocessed output
Felix Kühling writes:
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre2
Severity: normal
I tracked down this problem in the DRI CVS source tree. When compiling
with -O2
Package: g77-2.95
Version: 1:2.95.4-12
Severity: normal
I have a multi-language application. It used to compile fine. Now, it
has an undefined reference when linking.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/hello/runF77]g77 -g -O2 -o runF772C
helloclient.o ./.libs/libClient.a -L/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.4
tags 164135 + fixed
retitle 164135 [fixed in gcc-3.2] sin(a) * sin(b) gives wrong result
thanks
Khalid Shukri writes:
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 1:3.0.4-7
Kernel: self-compiled 2.4.18
libc6: 2.2.5-11.2
libc6-dev: 2.2.5-11.2
System: woody on a Pentium 4 with 2 GHz and 1 GB RAM
It looks to
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002 21:58:16 +0200
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tags 164588 + moreinfo
thanks
- please recheck with gcc-3.2_3.2.1-0pre4 (from unstable)
Just checked it, both with -march=athlon and -march=pentium2. This one
solves the problem. Thanks!
- please attach the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 164135 + fixed
Bug#164135: gcc bug?: sin(a) * sin(b) gives wrong result
Tags added: fixed
retitle 164135 [fixed in gcc-3.2] sin(a) * sin(b) gives wrong result
Bug#164135: gcc bug?: sin(a) * sin(b) gives wrong result
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Your message dated Mon, 21 Oct 2002 22:40:32 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#164588: gcc-3.2: -march=athlon or -march=pentium2 with -O2
incorrectly mix MMX with FPU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Mon, 21 Oct 2002 23:32:43 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#163236: Source dependency problem with gcc-2.95.4-12.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 15:03, Randolph Chung wrote:
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre4
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source
apt-get build-dep gcc-3.2
Reading Package Lists... Done Building
Dependency Tree... Done
E: Build-Depends dependency on
Your message dated Mon, 21 Oct 2002 17:11:18 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#165777: gcc-3.2: Improper build-dep
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: g++-3.2
Version: 3.2.1-0pre4
Severity: important
GCC 3.2.1 emits the following error:
foo.cc:16: generic thunk code fails for method `virtual void
B::foo(char*, ...)
' which uses `...'
when compiling the code included below. The same
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 08:51:03PM -0400, Reed Hedges wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: g++-3.2
Version: 3.2.1-0pre4
Severity: important
GCC 3.2.1 emits the following error:
foo.cc:16: generic thunk code fails for method `virtual void
B::foo(char*, ...)
21 matches
Mail list logo
