Bug#168888: G++ 3.2 breakage on sparc

2002-11-13 Thread Ryan Murray
Package: g++-3.2 Severity: important Version: 3.2.1-0pre5 As James has already posted, the following does not work on sparc: | (unstable)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat test.C | #include cstdio | | int main (int argc, char **argv) | { | printf(Hello\n); | return 0; | | } | (unstable)[EMAIL

gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds14-14_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2002-11-13 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: chill-2.95_2.95.4-14_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/chill-2.95_2.95.4-14_i386.deb cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-14_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-14_all.deb cpp-2.95_2.95.4-14_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95_2.95.4-14_i386.deb g++-2.95_2.95.4-14_i386.deb

Bug#163238: marked as done (Dependency problems with gcc-2.95.4-12 on hurd-i386)

2002-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Nov 2002 01:47:44 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#163238: fixed in gcc-2.95 2.95.4.ds14-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#163234: marked as done (gcc-2.95.4-12 won't build on native hurd-i386)

2002-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Nov 2002 01:47:44 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#163234: fixed in gcc-2.95 2.95.4.ds14-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#164582: marked as done (error when building crosscompiler)

2002-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Nov 2002 01:47:44 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#164582: fixed in gcc-2.95 2.95.4.ds14-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

new libstdc++ failures

2002-11-13 Thread Jack Howarth
Dan, We seem to be suddenly failing 7 additional libstd-c++ tests in last nights gcc-3.2 build. This isn't happening on entropy so I am wondering if we have lost those keymaps essential for the testsuite to pass. If I recall correctly keymaps for French, German and Itailian have to be

Re: new libstdc++ failures

2002-11-13 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 09:48:36AM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote: Dan, We seem to be suddenly failing 7 additional libstd-c++ tests in last nights gcc-3.2 build. This isn't happening on entropy so I am wondering if we have lost those keymaps essential for the testsuite to pass. If I recall

gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds14-13_i386.changes REJECTED

2002-11-13 Thread James Troup
rejected at the request of the maintainer -- James === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. Your rejected files are in incoming/REJECT/. (Some may also be in incoming/ if your .changes file was unparsable.)

Bug#169003: libstdc++2.10 creates incorrect libname, breaks at least apt-get

2002-11-13 Thread Iain Young
Package: libstdc++2.10 Version: 2.95.4-14 Severity: critical Hi, I run debian unstable(sid) on a SPARC arch machine. I just did an apt-get update; apt-get upgrade, and it installed the latest libstdxc++2.10, and then apt-get failed to work. Error from apt was: columbia:~# apt-get update

gcc 3.2 breakage?

2002-11-13 Thread Jack Howarth
Is anyone else seeing this? On doing an apt-get dist-upgrade on debian ppc sid tonight I had a bunch of problems with libstd-c++ going missing. It appears that we have stopped using the name /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 and changed it to libstdc++libc6.2-2.so.3 causing a bunch of binaries

Bug#169024: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 after apt-get upgrade today from unstable included incorrect symlink?

2002-11-13 Thread Ravenhall
Package: libstdc++3 Version: 1:3.0.4-13 After running a dist-upgrade today from unstable, several programs (including apt-cache, apt-get, and mozilla) would give the following error when attempting to launch them from a console: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3:

bug

2002-11-13 Thread norteo
Hi. I'll be quick. The problem is with the package: libstdc++-libc6.2-2 In the unstable distribution, when upgrading from 2.95.4-12 to 2.95.4.14 , some the applications that depend on this library do not work any more. For example aptitude. aptitude: error while loading shared libraries:

Bug#168991: libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2: latest unstable upgrade has broken symlink

2002-11-13 Thread Joe Barnett
Package: libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 Version: 1:2.95.4-14 Severity: grave Tags: sid Justification: renders package unusable latest upgrade to libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 version 1:2.95.4-14 breaks the system, as the /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 symlink does not exist, although the

Bug#168998: libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2: Upgrading totally hoses system

2002-11-13 Thread John Goerzen
Package: libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 Version: 1:2.95.4-14 Severity: grave When I upgrade from -7, I get problems like this all over: # python2.2 python2.2: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Even things like

Bug#168991: libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2: latest unstable upgrade has broken symlink

2002-11-13 Thread Magnus Danielson
Hi! I too ran into the problem and fixed my system by the following: heaven:/usr/lib# ln -s libstdc++-3libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 Thus, confirming Christian's fix. I've thankfully only lost a few minutes, but please rush out an update package before too many get locked up