Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 3.0.4ds3-13
Severity: serious
When I try to build gcc-3.0 on unstable, first there are bison errors
in java-parse.y. If I fix those, then I get more errors:
...
/tmp/buildd/gcc-3.0-3.0.4ds3/build/gcc/xgcc
-B/tmp/buildd/gcc-3.0-3.0.4ds3/build/gcc/ -nostdinc++
-L/tmp/bu
Synopsis: Superfluous warning when -std=c99/gnu99 and noreturn on main()
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Mon Nov 18 17:13:39 2002
State-Changed-Why:
Closed based on these comments:
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 16:30:10 -0800
From: A
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Agthorr wrote:
> Well, I also compile with -Wmissing-noreturn. If I add the noreturn
> attribute to main, gcc complains that the function returns. If I
> remove the noreturn, gcc complains that the function does not return.
>
> gcc can't have it both ways. ;)
However, if
Well, I also compile with -Wmissing-noreturn. If I add the noreturn
attribute to main, gcc complains that the function returns. If I
remove the noreturn, gcc complains that the function does not return.
gcc can't have it both ways. ;)
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 10:55:07PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Synopsis: Superfluous warning when -std=c99/gnu99 and noreturn on main()
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Mon Nov 18 14:55:06 2002
State-Changed-Why:
I can reproduce this. I think, the warning comes from the fact
that in C99, main() has a
Synopsis: _Pragma within macros is improperly expanded
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: neil
State-Changed-When: Mon Nov 18 12:51:59 2002
State-Changed-Why:
Fixed, I hope. Applied in 3.3, will soon apply in 3.2.2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-t
Neil Booth wrote:-
> I think this fixes it for good. I'm applying this to 3.3, and 3.2.2
> when it arrives.
>
> Neil.
>
> PR preprocessor/8524
> * cpplib.c (run_directive): Remove previous kludge to _Pragma.
> Add a new one in its place, which hopefully works.
> (skip_re
I think this fixes it for good. I'm applying this to 3.3, and 3.2.2
when it arrives.
Neil.
PR preprocessor/8524
* cpplib.c (run_directive): Remove previous kludge to _Pragma.
Add a new one in its place, which hopefully works.
(skip_rest_of_line): Change test for b
Joakim Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a simple solution out there ??? please tell me.
I think this bug will be fixed in GCC 3.3, at least I cannot reproduce
with GNAT from the GCC mainline.
Bonjour,
Dans le cadre de vos activités, vous avez peut-être besoin de services de
traduction. Société de traduction (Toutes langues, tous domaines), nous nous
permettons donc de vous poser deux questions :
1) Êtes-vous potentiellement intéressés ?
2) Quelle est la personne à contacter ?
Sincèr
Bonjour,
Dans le cadre de vos activités, vous avez peut-être besoin de services de
traduction. Société de traduction (Toutes langues, tous domaines), nous nous
permettons donc de vous poser deux questions :
1) Êtes-vous potentiellement intéressés ?
2) Quelle est la personne à contacter ?
Sincèr
Bonjour,
Dans le cadre de vos activités, vous avez peut-être besoin de services de
traduction. Société de traduction (Toutes langues, tous domaines), nous nous
permettons donc de vous poser deux questions :
1) Êtes-vous potentiellement intéressés ?
2) Quelle est la personne à contacter ?
Sincèr
12 matches
Mail list logo
