[hppa-linux, gcc-3.2 regression] cc1 segmentation fault at -O2

Submitter-Id: net Originator:Randolph Chung Organization: Debian Confidential: no Synopsis: cc1 segfaults @ -O2 when building a simple function Severity: serious Priority: medium Category: optimization Class: ice-on-legal-code Release: 3.2.2 20030124

Bug#178909: gcc-3.2: sparc regression, ICE when optimizing (mem_loc_descriptor, at dwarf2out.c:7903)

Package: gcc-3.2 Version: 3.2.2-0pre6 Severity: important This is a regression from gcc-2.95 and isn't fixed by gcc-snapshot (20030118-1). Compiling without optimization (-O0) makes the ICE go away. I've made the -save-temps output available here:

Bug#178965: g++-3.2: sparc regression, ICE when optimizing (gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:662)

/fpu_ieee.ii.gz (It's 280k uncompressed, so I haven't included in the report, sorry) | Automatic build of aranym_0.7.0-1 on vore by sbuild/sparc 1.170 | Build started at 20030129-1353 | ** [...] | ** Using build dependencies supplied

gcc-3.2_3.2.2ds6-0pre7_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.2-0pre7_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.2-0pre7_all.deb cpp-3.2_3.2.2-0pre7_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.2-0pre7_i386.deb fastjar_3.2.2-0pre7_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/fastjar_3.2.2-0pre7_i386.deb fixincludes_3.2.2-0pre7_i386.deb

Bug#178867: marked as done (libstdc++5: shlibs depends =1:3.2.1-1 - compiling against 3.2.2 breaks running against 3.2.1)

Your message dated Wed, 29 Jan 2003 17:02:55 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#178867: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.2ds6-0pre7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#178325: marked as done (LIBC_DEV value for libc12)

Your message dated Wed, 29 Jan 2003 17:02:54 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#178325: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.2ds6-0pre7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#178326: marked as done (Problems with __cxa_atexit conditionals)

Your message dated Wed, 29 Jan 2003 17:02:54 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#178326: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.2ds6-0pre7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#177036: marked as done (Statically linking executable fails (no crtbeginT.o on m68k))

Your message dated Wed, 29 Jan 2003 17:02:54 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#177036: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.2ds6-0pre7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#167932: marked as done (Please include /usr/lib/jni in default JNI search path)

Your message dated Wed, 29 Jan 2003 17:02:54 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#167932: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.2ds6-0pre7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#178327: marked as done (GNU locale workaround is overly aggressive)

Your message dated Wed, 29 Jan 2003 17:02:54 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#178327: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.2ds6-0pre7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#178328: marked as done (NetBSD support patches)

Your message dated Wed, 29 Jan 2003 17:02:55 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#178328: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.2ds6-0pre7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#168086: marked as done ([PR target/9090] arm ICE with = -O2; regression from 2.95)

Your message dated Wed, 29 Jan 2003 17:02:54 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#168086: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.2ds6-0pre7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#178602: marked as done (gcc-3.2_1:3.2.2ds5-0pre6(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: bad build-depends)

Your message dated Wed, 29 Jan 2003 17:02:55 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#178602: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.2ds6-0pre7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#177674: marked as done (Missing Build-Depends on autotools-dev)

Your message dated Wed, 29 Jan 2003 17:02:54 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#177674: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.2ds6-0pre7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processed: Changing submitter

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: submitter 178328 ! Bug#178328: NetBSD support patches Changed Bug submitter. (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#179018: gcc-3.2: [m68k] segfaults when building xemacs21

Package: gcc-3.2 Version: N/A; reported 2003-01-29 Severity: important [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/buildsudo chroot chroot-unstable bash-2.05b# gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/m68k-linux/3.2.2/specs Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,proto,pascal,objc