This is *almost* certainly related to bug #178325 (LIBC_DEV value for
libc12), but I don't see any obvious reason for it to be failing like
this; the patch simply mimics and continues the prior pattern of testing
in a cascade fashion for various things, before bailing to a default of
libc6-dev,
[going to vacation for three weeks, therefore trimmed the CCs]
Zack Weinberg writes:
Gabriel Dos Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Zack Weinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Benjamin Kosnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| I've versioned the runtimes assuming that 3.3 will not break the
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.2-0pre7
Severity: important
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of lcdproc_0.4.3-12 on repeat.rfc822.org by sbuild/mipsel
1.170
Build started at 20030111-2236
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
--On Thursday, January 30, 2003 04:52:41 PM -0800 Zack Weinberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm relaying this to the LSB working group in charge of C++ and also
to the Debian gcc team -- Debian is presently in the process of
transitioning to the 3.2 ABI and I am pretty sure they also were
gcc-3.2_3.2.2ds7-0pre8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-3.2_3.2.2ds7-0pre8.dsc
gcc-3.2_3.2.2ds7-0pre8.diff.gz
cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.2-0pre8_all.deb
libstdc++5-doc_3.2.2-0pre8_all.deb
g77-3.2-doc_3.2.2-0pre8_all.deb
gnat-3.2-doc_3.2.2-0pre8_all.deb
Rejected: gcc-3.2_3.2.2ds7-0pre8.dsc refers to gcc-3.2_3.2.2ds7.orig.tar.gz,
but I can't find it in the queue or in the pool.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
Your rejected files are in incoming/REJECT/.
Accepted:
cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.2-0pre8_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.2-0pre8_all.deb
cpp-3.2_3.2.2-0pre8_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.2-0pre8_i386.deb
fastjar_3.2.2-0pre8_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/fastjar_3.2.2-0pre8_i386.deb
fixincludes_3.2.2-0pre8_i386.deb
Your message dated Fri, 31 Jan 2003 16:49:18 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#179128: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.2ds7-0pre8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
This should be fixed upstream now...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-01/msg02409.html
Package: gcj-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.2-0pre5
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
it would be cool if the gcj package somehow made sure that a jar
command was available, either by depending on the fastjar package or
with a small shell script that calls the Java implementation.
Usually, fastjar is part of the gcc
10 matches
Mail list logo
