Michael Stone writes:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 02:14:32PM -0600, you wrote:
coreutils fails to build from source on m68k, test failing.
Well, it works everywhere else. GCC compile error? The test that's
failing is the sha1sum validation, the source for which has not changed.
Roman tracked
Accepted:
chill-2.95_2.95.4-16_arm.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/chill-2.95_2.95.4-16_arm.deb
cpp-2.95_2.95.4-16_arm.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95_2.95.4-16_arm.deb
g++-2.95_2.95.4-16_arm.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/g++-2.95_2.95.4-16_arm.deb
g77-2.95_2.95.4-16_arm.deb
to
Rene Engelhard writes:
Package: gcc-2.95
Version: 1:2.95.4-16
Severity: serious
Hallo Matthias,
I am not the buildd admin of arm but since there was no bug filed to
today I do it:
The latest gcc 2.95 upload does not build on the arm buildd..
See the packages at
Randolph Chung writes:
In reference to a message from Matthias Klose, dated Mar 01:
Matthias Klose writes:
AFAIK the transition from 3.2 to 3.3 requires recompilation of C++
code due to the changed exception handling (now DWARF2 based). As
libstdc++ in 3.2 and 3.2 have the same soname,
Randolph Chung writes:
In reference to a message from Matthias Klose, dated Mar 01:
Matthias Klose writes:
AFAIK the transition from 3.2 to 3.3 requires recompilation of C++
code due to the changed exception handling (now DWARF2 based). As
libstdc++ in 3.2 and 3.2 have the same
retitle 184108 [fixed in 3.3] ICE when warning about cleanup nastiness in
switch statements
thanks
Andrew Suffield writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ g++ -ofoo foo.cpp
foo.cpp: In function `int main()':
foo.cpp:14: jump to case label
foo.cpp:13: enters scope of non-POD `foo x'
Internal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 184108 [fixed in 3.3] ICE when warning about cleanup nastiness in
switch statements
Bug#184108: ICE when warning about cleanup nastiness in switch statements
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
[sorry for the late reply, this mail went into some obscure folder]
Kaveh R. Ghazi writes:
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kaveh R. Ghazi writes:
Thanks Matthias, but seeing your patch two things occur to me:
One is we don't have a tester for x86 Debian (of any
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Mar 8 13:57:02 UTC 2003
Native configuration is i386-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes7372
# of unexpected successes 1
# of
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Mar 8 13:57:02 UTC 2003
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.pt/repo3.C (test for excess errors)
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre4
Severity: serious
A new upload is in the works.
Package: libstdc++5-dev
Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre4
Severity: grave
The version of libstdc++5-dev indicated above depends on LIBC_DEV, a
package which does not exist.
Daniel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux torrent.burrows.local 2.4.20 #4
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kaveh R. Ghazi writes:
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yes, then I will test it on Debian unstable as well.
Great, thanks. Though be aware that being the tester will mean
Debian specific bugs will be pointed your way,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 184117 serious
Bug#184117: libstdc++5-dev: dependency LIBC_DEV cannot be fulfilled
Severity set to `serious'.
severity 184120 serious
Bug#184120: Depends on non-existant package LIBC_DEV
Severity set to `serious'.
merge 184119 184117
Package: libffi2-dev
Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre3
Severity: important
Hi there.
SableVM depends on the libffi2 package, and more specifically,
build-depends on libffi2-dev. It seems the latest GCC upgrade broke
libffi2-dev, as can be seen below:
$ apt-get install libffi2-dev
Reading Package Lists...
Hi there,
The problem was effectively due to my misreading of libffi's
documentation for return values (which are handled differently from
parameters). Thanks for your help identifying the problem.
You should probably close the bug.
Thanks,
Etienne
(upstream SableVM author)
--
Etienne M.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 184117 184120
Bug#184117: libstdc++5-dev: dependency LIBC_DEV cannot be fulfilled
Bug#184120: Depends on non-existant package LIBC_DEV
Merged 184117 184120.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Package: libgcj3-dev
When attempting to install this package, I get the following error
message:
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
libgcj3-dev: Depends: LIBC_DEV but it is not installable
I have libc6 and libc6-dev 2.3.1-14 installed.
I'm guessing LIBC_DEV is an
18 matches
Mail list logo