[3.3 regression] method parametrized by template does not work everywhere

2003-03-24 Thread Matthias Klose
Submitter-Id: net Originator:Thimo Neubauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: The Debian Project Confidential: no Synopsis: Severity: non-critical Priority: medium Category: c++ Class: ice-on-legal-code Release: 3.3 CVS 20030323 System: Debian GNU/Linux

Bug#185604: c++/10199: [3.3 regression] method parametrized by template does not work everywhere

2003-03-24 Thread gcc-gnats
Thank you very much for your problem report. It has the internal identification `c++/10199'. The individual assigned to look at your report is: unassigned. Category: c++ Responsible:unassigned Synopsis: [3.3 regression] method parametrized by template does not work everywhere

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #185604 to gcc-gnats as PR c++/10199

2003-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # submitted Debian report #185604 to gcc-gnats as PR c++/10199 # http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=viewpr=c++/10199database=gcc forwarded 185604 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#185604: g++-3.2: method parametrized by template does not work everywhere

By now and increase your cell phone signal by 300%. rcqph fm

2003-03-24 Thread
The Cell Phone Antenna Booster. This product will increase your signal by 300% All for under 10.00 To read more about our product, please click the link. PUSH THIS zgz ybm

Bug#186139: gcc-3.2: [alpha] va_start is off by one

2003-03-24 Thread Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
Package: gcc-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre6 Severity: normal In the attached program, failing_func should return its first variadic argument, but somehow it returns wrong_value instead. The main function exits with code 0 if the result is correct. I believe this is what causes Debian Bug#185973.

Bug#186139: gcc-3.2: [alpha] va_start is off by one

2003-03-24 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 10:14:38PM +0200, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote: Package: gcc-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre6 Severity: normal In the attached program, failing_func should return its first variadic argument, but somehow it returns wrong_value instead. The main function exits with code 0

Bug#186139: gcc-3.2: [alpha] va_start is off by one

2003-03-24 Thread Matthias Klose
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo writes: Package: gcc-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre6 Severity: normal In the attached program, failing_func should return its first variadic argument, but somehow it returns wrong_value instead. The main function exits with code 0 if the result is correct. - does the code

Bug#186139: gcc-3.2: [alpha] va_start is off by one

2003-03-24 Thread Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Coincidentally, I believe that Falk Hueffner fixed this in the GCC source very recently. Just FYI. You're right, it's PR target/9700.

Results for 3.3 20030314 (prerelease) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnu

2003-03-24 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 14 19:22:27 UTC 2003 Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu === libstdc++-v3 tests === Running target unix XPASS: 22_locale/collate_byname.cc execution test XPASS: 22_locale/collate_members_char.cc execution test XPASS:

Bug#186185: [arm] Internal compiler error when compiling fftw

2003-03-24 Thread James A. Treacy
Package: gcc Version: 3.2.3 Compiling fftw version 2.1.3 on arm with gcc 3.2 results in an internal compiler error: cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../fftw -I../fftw -I./../fftw -I. -O6 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -W -Wcast-qual -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -pedantic -fno-schedule-insns