Bug#188811: gcc segfaults on HPPA while building xprint-xprintorg

2003-04-13 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: gcc-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre8 Severity: important xprint-xprintorg fails to build on HPPA (see http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=xprint-xprintorgver=0.0.8.cvs20030403-1arch=hppastamp=1050208551file=logas=raw ) The reason is that gcc segfaults: make[3]: Entering directory

gcc-3.3 override disparity

2003-04-13 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): g++-3.3_3.3-0pre4_hppa.deb: package says priority is standard, override says optional. gcc-3.3-base_3.3-0pre4_hppa.deb: package says priority is important, override says optional.

gcc-3.3_3.3ds4-0pre4_hppa.changes ACCEPTED

2003-04-13 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-3.3-doc_3.3-0pre4_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3-doc_3.3-0pre4_all.deb cpp-3.3_3.3-0pre4_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3-0pre4_hppa.deb fastjar_3.3-0pre4_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fastjar_3.3-0pre4_hppa.deb fixincludes_3.3-0pre4_hppa.deb to

Bug#185662: marked as done (libstdc++5: Illegal instruction on 386 CPUs)

2003-04-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 13 Apr 2003 02:47:35 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#185662: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3ds4-0pre4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#188811: gcc segfaults on HPPA while building xprint-xprintorg

2003-04-13 Thread Matthias Klose
Drew Parsons writes: Package: gcc-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre8 Severity: important xprint-xprintorg fails to build on HPPA (see http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=xprint-xprintorgver=0.0.8.cvs20030403-1arch=hppastamp=1050208551file=logas=raw ) The reason is that gcc segfaults:

Re: Bug#184446: marked as done (libstdc++5-dev has i486 specific asm code)

2003-04-13 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 02:03:03AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: * On i386, build libstdc++ optimized for i486 and above. The library in /usr/lib is built for i386. Closes: #184446, #185662. Does it really? The i486-specific code was in a _header_, not in the library. --

Bug#186139: gcc-3.2: [alpha] va_start is off by one

2003-04-13 Thread Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
I tested newer versions of gcc-3.2 and gcc-snapshot. gcc-2.95 2.95.4-17 buggy, won't be fixed gcc-3.0 3.0.4-7 buggy, removed from unstable gcc-3.2 3.2.3-0pre8 buggy gcc-3.3 3.3-0pre2 fixed gcc-snapshot 20030410-1 fixed, unlike 20030314-1

Re: Bug#184446: marked as done (libstdc++5-dev has i486 specific asm code)

2003-04-13 Thread Matthias Klose
Daniel Jacobowitz writes: On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 02:03:03AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: * On i386, build libstdc++ optimized for i486 and above. The library in /usr/lib is built for i386. Closes: #184446, #185662. Does it really? The i486-specific code was in a

Results for 3.3 20030412 (Debian prerelease) testsuite on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu

2003-04-13 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Apr 12 19:08:07 UTC 2003 Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 y_tst.o compile UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o-y_tst.o link UNRESOLVED:

Oddity in Unstable (gcc 3.2.3)

2003-04-13 Thread Cyrus Kriticos
i had installed Debian woody, and I set everything to unstable in the sources.list file. Then I did an apt-get upgrade only later to realize that I never selected gcc in the initial installation. So With unstable in my sources.list, i proceeded to apt-get install gcc. In which it finished. But