On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 11:10:54PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> Just a quick status update on gcc-3.3 and the various NetBSD ports.
>
> 1) I'm working on a patch for 3.3; the netbsd-* patches from 3.2 don't
> even remotely apply cleanly, due to major changes in the files they modify
> (thankfully, s
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre9
Severity: important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This version of gcc-3.2 fails randomly, like
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:20570: Error: value of 7f3ffab00deb1268 too large for field
of 4 bytes at 09a
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2003 21:09:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#190757: please add a warning for conversion from "int" to
"unsigned int"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 20:40:11 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> that disconcerts me, I thought -Wall would include all warnings.
No, it never has and never will. -Wall is probably best described as "all
warnings the gcc developers consider useful under allmost all
circumstances".
Ray
--
"People s
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 08:40:11PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 02:18:18PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
> > Is this roughly what you want:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% gcc-3.2 -Wall -Wconversion -c c.c
> > c.c: In function `main':
> > c.c:8: warning: passing arg 1 of `a
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 02:18:18PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> Is this roughly what you want:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% gcc-3.2 -Wall -Wconversion -c c.c
> c.c: In function `main':
> c.c:8: warning: passing arg 1 of `a' as unsigned due to prototype
> c.c:8: warning: negative integer implicitl
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 05:41:20PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Package: gcc-3.2
> Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre9
> Severity: wishlist
>
> the following code (compiled with -Wall -pedantic) could be
> considered "buggy", because it implicitly converts a
> signed int to unsigned int when calling "a". if y
I ran into another interesting cross-compile bug:
Using dpkg-buildpackage -ahurd-i386, it configures gcc-3.3 like so:
--build=i386-linux
--host=i386-gnu
--target=i386-linux
It looks like:
DEB_TARGET_ARCH := $(shell dpkg-architecture -f \
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 06:06:11PM +0200, Felix Havemann wrote:
> On Dienstag, April 22, 2003, at 08:08 Uhr, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> >This looks like a genuine bug.
>
> Is there a cure in sight? Who feels responsible for fixing this bug? I
> am getting desperate...
I have reassigned the bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 188976
Bug#188976: libc6-sparc64: Depends: libc6 (= 2.2.5-11.2) but 2.2.5-11.5 is
installed
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
On Dienstag, April 22, 2003, at 08:08 Uhr, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
This looks like a genuine bug.
Is there a cure in sight? Who feels responsible for fixing this bug? I
am getting desperate...
Best wishes, Felix
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre9
Severity: wishlist
the following code (compiled with -Wall -pedantic) could be
considered "buggy", because it implicitly converts a
signed int to unsigned int when calling "a". if you run it,
it will print the number 2^32-1 instead of -1.
#include
int a (u
Just a quick status update on gcc-3.3 and the various NetBSD ports.
1) I'm working on a patch for 3.3; the netbsd-* patches from 3.2 don't
even remotely apply cleanly, due to major changes in the files they modify
(thankfully, said changes are in the direction of increased sanity!)
2) Due to the
13 matches
Mail list logo
