Results for 3.3 20030506 (Debian prerelease) testsuite on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu

7918 # of unexpected failures3 # of unexpected successes 2 # of expected failures 96 # of unresolved testcases 2 # of untested testcases 23 # of unsupported tests 18 /build/packages/gcc/3.3/gcc-3.3-3.3ds8/build/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.3 20030506

Results for 3.3 20030506 (Debian prerelease) testsuite on i386-pc-linux-gnu

/packages/gcc/3.3/gcc-3.3-3.3ds8/build/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.3 20030506 (Debian prerelease) === g77 tests === Running target unix === g77 Summary === # of expected passes1686 # of unsupported tests 8 /build/packages/gcc/3.3/gcc-3.3

Bug#191551: marked as done (FTBFS: NetBSD files changed from 3.2 to 3.3)

Your message dated Tue, 06 May 2003 16:19:53 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#191551: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3ds8-0pre8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#191684: marked as done (libstdc++5 3.3 breaks optimized binaries compiled with g++ 3.2)

Your message dated Tue, 06 May 2003 16:19:53 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#191684: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3ds8-0pre8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#190812: marked as done (treelang missing man page)

Your message dated Tue, 06 May 2003 16:19:52 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#190812: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3ds8-0pre8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#189545: marked as done (ICE with certain expressions as 3rd clause of for loop)

Your message dated Tue, 06 May 2003 16:19:52 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#189545: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3ds8-0pre8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

gcc-3.3_3.3ds8-0pre8_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-3.3-doc_3.3-0pre8_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3-doc_3.3-0pre8_all.deb cpp-3.3_3.3-0pre8_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3-0pre8_i386.deb fastjar_3.3-0pre8_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fastjar_3.3-0pre8_i386.deb fixincludes_3.3-0pre8_i386.deb to pool/main

gcc-3.3_3.3ds8-0pre8_hppa.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-3.3_3.3-0pre8_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3-0pre8_hppa.deb fastjar_3.3-0pre8_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fastjar_3.3-0pre8_hppa.deb fixincludes_3.3-0pre8_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fixincludes_3.3-0pre8_hppa.deb g++-3.3_3.3-0pre8_hppa.deb to pool/main/g

gcc-3.3 override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): g++-3.3_3.3-0pre8_i386.deb: package says priority is standard, override says optional. gcc-3.3_3.3-0pre8_i386.deb: package says priority is standard, override says optional. gcc-3.3-base_

Bug#190791: gcc-3.2: random failure

Hoi .. On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 12:45:11AM +0200, Michel Ddnzer wrote: >This version of gcc-3.2 fails randomly, like [...] I saw this two on my PPC .. debian-sid. I updated on saturday and builded OpenOffice.org-1.0.3-2 and got a segfault with gcc-3.2 and after a simple retry a segfault with ld.

Bug#192135: gnat-3.3: Convention Fortran matrices mishandled in generics

Package: gnat-3.3 Version: 1:3.3-0pre7 Severity: normal Consider the following test program. It prints out the matrix A twice, using identical code. However the second copy of the code is wrapped up in a generic. Notice how the rows and columns are swapped in the second print out? This only o