Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3-1
Severity: normal
I try to compile 2.4.20 standar kernel
this is the error:
make[4]: *** [ide-cd.o] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.20/drivers/ide'
make[3]: *** [first_rule] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
gcc-3.3-base_3.3-2_i386.deb: package says priority is important, override says
optional.
g++-3.3_3.3-2_i386.deb: package says priority is standard, override says
optional.
Accepted:
cpp-3.3-doc_3.3-2_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3-doc_3.3-2_all.deb
cpp-3.3_3.3-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3-2_i386.deb
fastjar_3.3-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fastjar_3.3-2_i386.deb
fixincludes_3.3-2_i386.deb
to
Luca A. Porrera writes:
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3-1
Severity: normal
I try to compile 2.4.20 standar kernel
this is the error:
[...] here (probably) is the compiler error.
Please send the command line from the compiler, and the messages from
the compiler. Don't forget to add the
Your message dated Sun, 18 May 2003 07:47:55 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#193689: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3ds9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
cpp-3.3_3.3-2_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3-2_sparc.deb
fastjar_3.3-2_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fastjar_3.3-2_sparc.deb
fixincludes_3.3-2_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fixincludes_3.3-2_sparc.deb
g++-3.3_3.3-2_sparc.deb
to
Package: gcc-3.2-doc,gcc-3.3-doc,cpp-3.2-doc,cpp-3.3-doc,g77-3.2-doc,g77-3.3-doc
Version: all; reported 2003-05-18
Severity: serious
Justification: Debian will remain 100% free software
The GCC manuals use the GNU FDL with invariant sections. This is
categorically non-free according to
Debian Installer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cpp-3.3_3.3-2_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3-2_sparc.deb
Could you please warn me when you do byhand uploads of packages, like
this? The buildd's wasted a good 8 hours on this so far and probably
would have wasted even more if I
Nathanael Nerode writes:
Package:
gcc-3.2-doc,gcc-3.3-doc,cpp-3.2-doc,cpp-3.3-doc,g77-3.2-doc,g77-3.3-doc
Version: all; reported 2003-05-18
Severity: serious
Justification: Debian will remain 100% free software
The GCC manuals use the GNU FDL with invariant sections. This is
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/other/packed1.C execution test
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes7923
# of unexpected
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: initexc execution - gij test
FAIL: initexc execution - gij test
=== libjava Summary ===
# of expected passes2987
# of unexpected failures
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: initexc execution - gij test
FAIL: initexc execution - gij test
=== libjava Summary ===
# of expected passes2987
# of unexpected failures
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is i386-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/tls/init-2.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes7997
# of unexpected
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/other/packed1.C execution test
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes7923
# of unexpected
Important citations:
* Motion to take action on the unhappy GNU FDL issue (by Branden
Robinson)
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200304/msg00189.html
(Note that the following discussion contains lots of agreement and no
serious opposition.)
* Proposed statement wrt GNU FDL
Nathanael Nerode writes:
:-( At the moment GCC is the only package with invariant-section material
which I use, which is why I specifically filed bugs against it.
Please could you point me to the invariant-section material? Tried to
find it, but maybe it's too late here in Europe and I'm not
16 matches
Mail list logo