Package: libstdc++5-3.3-doc
Version: 1:3.3-3
Severity: minor
The HTML title (in browser titlebar) of
http://localhost/doc/libstdc++5-3.3-doc/libstdc++/html_user/
is Main Page what does not makes clear that this browser window documents
GNU C++ librayr.
Please change to something like
Package: libstdc++5-3.3-doc
Version: 1:3.3-3
Severity: normal
It is unclear from the API docs whether std::lower_bound if there are no
element element not less than val.
Also check docs of std::upper_bound.
Please also comment me on this (it is also broken in other C++ docs I have
:-( ).
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10890
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-06 16:52 ---
Patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2003-06/msg00743.html
--- You are receiving this
On 06-Jun-2003 Phil Edwards wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 08:37:13PM +0600, Victor Porton wrote:
It is unclear from the API docs whether std::lower_bound if there are no
element element not less than val.
That question does not parse. Could you rephrase please?
The brief description
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11052
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 11:30:30PM +0600, Victor Porton wrote:
Returns:
An iterator pointing to the first element not less than val.
]]
Returns clause does not consider the case when there are no elements not
less than val in the iterators range.
Well, if you think about it a bit,
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 12:31:41AM +0600, Victor Porton wrote:
Probably you should say:
Returns:
An iterator pointing to the first element not less than val or
end if no such element.
The version in the development tree already says something similar.
--
If ye love wealth
While the report remains true (in fact), on even recent versions of GCC
3.3, a discussion with the NetBSD toolchain folks pointed out that this is
not, in fact, the right way to accomplish the actual goal that was being
aimed for.
Therefore, this bug can be closed (both upstream, and on Debian),
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 12:22:15AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
The GCC source tarball contains, well, a lot of things. The following are
FDLed with invariant sections or cover texts and so non-free:
[snip]
Note also that gcc/cp/g++.1 is just a pointer to gcc.1, so it's useless
9 matches
Mail list logo
