[Bug optimization/11366] [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2

2003-07-19 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366 mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Targe

Missing dependency

2003-07-19 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
Right now, if you upgrade "gcc-3.3" from 3.3 to 3.3.1, you can end up with a broken g++ - it will still search for /3.3/crtbeginS.o instead of 3.3.1/crtbeginS.o. I have the feeling that g++-3.3 should depend on precisely the same version of gcc-3.3... -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software

Re: Bug#201882: gnat-3.3: Missing the Ada run-time shared libraries

2003-07-19 Thread Jérôme Marant
Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 19/07/2003 (11:23) : >> Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > What do you mean? That it is a bad idea at the moment as nothing is >> > stable or that it is a bad idea whenever? I don't agree with

Bug#202017: gcc-3.3: Unnecessary branching with INET/INET6 port setting

2003-07-19 Thread Herbert Xu
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 01:05:52PM +0200, Martin v. L?wis wrote: > Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This is not the problem. gcc assumes the asm will return the same > > value unless it is explicitely marked "volatile" (or has no oputputs), > > and will happily merge them. > > I se

Bug#202017: gcc-3.3: Unnecessary branching with INET/INET6 port setting

2003-07-19 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is not the problem. gcc assumes the asm will return the same > value unless it is explicitely marked "volatile" (or has no oputputs), > and will happily merge them. I see. Then this would be a glibc bug, for using __asm__ __volatile__ in __bswap16.

Bug#202017: gcc-3.3: Unnecessary branching with INET/INET6 port setting

2003-07-19 Thread Falk Hueffner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin v. =?iso-8859-15?q?L=F6wis?=) writes: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > As you can see, the branch due to the family is unnecessary. This bug > > exists in gcc272, gcc 2.95 and gcc 3.2 > > It is unlikely that this bug will ever get fixed, as gcc won't be > able to de

Bug#202017: marked as done (gcc-3.3: Unnecessary branching with INET/INET6 port setting)

2003-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2003 19:08:37 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#202017: gcc-3.3: Unnecessary branching with INET/INET6 port setting has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#201882: gnat-3.3: Missing the Ada run-time shared libraries

2003-07-19 Thread Preben Randhol
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 19/07/2003 (11:23) : > Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > What do you mean? That it is a bad idea at the moment as nothing is > > stable or that it is a bad idea whenever? I don't agree with the > > latter. > > What do you propose? Upstre

Bug#202017: gcc-3.3: Unnecessary branching with INET/INET6 port setting

2003-07-19 Thread Martin v. Löwis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As you can see, the branch due to the family is unnecessary. This bug > exists in gcc272, gcc 2.95 and gcc 3.2 It is unlikely that this bug will ever get fixed, as gcc won't be able to determine that the two __asm__ blocks really have the same effect. So if you wan

Re: GCC problems!!

2003-07-19 Thread Martin v. Löwis
BjÂÃrn Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello! > > I have problems with GCC. I thought that my problems were caused > by libc, so I upgraded to the latest version(2.3.x), but it made > no difference, GCC still can't find the required header files when > I try to compile something. It can't