OpenOffice.org now compiles iwth gcc 3.3.1 thanks.
--
Thanks
KenF
OpenOffice.org developer
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:47:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kernel image now support i486 emulation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:47:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kernel image now support i486 emulation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:47:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kernel image now support i486 emulation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:47:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kernel image now support i486 emulation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Jul 28 18:38:03 UTC 2003
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/forced1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/tls/init-2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.eh/terminate2.C Execution test
XPASS: g++.other/init
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Jul 28 18:38:03 UTC 2003
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes8038
# of unexpected successes 1
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11732
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11717
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-07-30
20:43 ---
*** Bug 11732 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- You are receiv
Accepted:
cpp-3.3_3.3.1-0rc2_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3.1-0rc2_sparc.deb
fastjar_3.3.1-0rc2_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fastjar_3.3.1-0rc2_sparc.deb
fixincludes_3.3.1-0rc2_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fixincludes_3.3.1-0rc2_sparc.deb
g++-3.3_3.3.1-0rc2_sparc.deb
> > No, with -O2 it breaks on
> > gcc-3.23.2.3-6
> > gcc-3.33.3.1-0rc1
> > gcc-snapshot 20030722-1
>
> but it did work with gcc-2.95?
There is no 2.95 on hppa.
- Forwarded message from Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 08:35:00 -0400
From: Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bogoutil segfaults
> Does SPARC support unaligned access?
Not as far as I know
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Stepan Koltsov
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: HashMap serialization does not work
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Category: libgcj
>Class: sw-bug
>Release: 3.3.1 20030722 (Debian prerelease) (Debian testing/unstable)
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11717
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11713
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
A
Hi,
I thought you might be interested in these 2 bugs:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214051
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11720
which detail c++ 3.3.1 causing mozilla's configure script to fail; [if
you've not already noticed, that is]. I've seen this wi
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11713
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-30
10:34 ---
A binchop with Janis' script shows that the problem was introduced on the
gcc-3_3-branch be
17 matches
Mail list logo