This should be changed. Sorry I didn't catch it earlier...
++ix86_cpu_string = cpu_names [TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT_pentium];
For unknown (to me) reasons, scheduling is very different on the
original Pentium (586) and the Pentium Pro (686).
Perhaps surprisingly, the 686 scheduling runs better on
Go doW CAcIT
Hey Debian-gcc GHRel
Hey Debian-gcc WmYvHfOgE .
oxxOeOV Debian-gcc
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre1
Severity: normal
Hi,
here's an ICE when building mplayer with altivec support on ppc:
gcc -O4 -pipe -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer -D_REENTRANT
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -g -DHAVE_AV_CONFIG_H -I..
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11717
--- Additional Comments From mmazur at kernel dot pl 2003-08-17 11:57
---
I also have this bug with 3.3.1 on alpha. With 3.3 it didn't occur.
--- You are receiving
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10110
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
severity 205899 important
forwarded 205899 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11793
tags 205899 + upstream
merge 205899 203835
thanks
Guido Guenther writes:
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre1
Severity: normal
Hi,
here's an ICE when building mplayer with altivec support on ppc:
gcc -O4 -pipe
Your message dated Sun, 17 Aug 2003 22:04:10 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed gcc-defaults-1.9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Aug 15 17:56:32 UTC 2003
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/pretty1.C scan-assembler top level
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/pretty2.C (test for excess errors)
WARNING: g++.dg/ext/pretty2.C compilation
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Aug 15 17:56:32 UTC 2003
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/pretty1.C scan-assembler top level
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/pretty2.C (test for excess errors)
WARNING: g++.dg/ext/pretty2.C compilation failed
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11959
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11959
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
12 matches
Mail list logo