Default mtune/mcpu setting for i386

2003-08-17 Thread Nathanael Nerode
This should be changed. Sorry I didn't catch it earlier... ++ix86_cpu_string = cpu_names [TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT_pentium]; For unknown (to me) reasons, scheduling is very different on the original Pentium (586) and the Pentium Pro (686). Perhaps surprisingly, the 686 scheduling runs better on

Fw: reaI TR/\NNy HAR|)C0RE, Debian-gcc... EyFtMTXj G

2003-08-17 Thread fozote
Go doW CAcIT Hey Debian-gcc GHRel

Re [8]: SE}{ CRlMES IN |RAQ TzGqfyfcC

2003-08-17 Thread rykekav
Hey Debian-gcc WmYvHfOgE . oxxOeOV Debian-gcc

Bug#205899: gcc-3.3: [ppc] ICE on code using altivec

2003-08-17 Thread Guido Guenther
Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre1 Severity: normal Hi, here's an ICE when building mplayer with altivec support on ppc: gcc -O4 -pipe -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer -D_REENTRANT -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -g -DHAVE_AV_CONFIG_H -I.. -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64

[Bug target/11717] [3.3 regression] [alpha] unrecognizable insn compiling for.c of kernel 2.4.22-pre8

2003-08-17 Thread mmazur at kernel dot pl
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11717 --- Additional Comments From mmazur at kernel dot pl 2003-08-17 11:57 --- I also have this bug with 3.3.1 on alpha. With 3.3 it didn't occur. --- You are receiving

[Bug ada/10110] [3.3/3.4 regression] [mipsel-linux]ada bootstrap error

2003-08-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10110 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

Bug#205899: gcc-3.3: [ppc] ICE on code using altivec

2003-08-17 Thread Matthias Klose
severity 205899 important forwarded 205899 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11793 tags 205899 + upstream merge 205899 203835 thanks Guido Guenther writes: Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre1 Severity: normal Hi, here's an ICE when building mplayer with altivec support on ppc: gcc -O4 -pipe

Bug#205210: marked as done (g++: package description improvement)

2003-08-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 17 Aug 2003 22:04:10 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed gcc-defaults-1.9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Results for 3.4 20030815 (experimental) testsuite on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu

2003-08-17 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Aug 15 17:56:32 UTC 2003 Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/ext/pretty1.C scan-assembler top level FAIL: g++.dg/ext/pretty2.C (test for excess errors) WARNING: g++.dg/ext/pretty2.C compilation

Results for 3.4 20030815 (experimental) testsuite on s390-ibm-linux-gnu

2003-08-17 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Aug 15 17:56:32 UTC 2003 Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/ext/pretty1.C scan-assembler top level FAIL: g++.dg/ext/pretty2.C (test for excess errors) WARNING: g++.dg/ext/pretty2.C compilation failed

[Bug target/11959] [3.4 regression] bootstrap error in libstdc++

2003-08-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11959 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/11959] [3.4 regression] bootstrap error in libstdc++

2003-08-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11959 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added