Fw: Debian-gcc! EX0TlC Iatina girIs in C!R/\-Z-Y ACTl0N! E 8 Ra6U dDJ

Hey yUNGTcJOatE Debian-gcc zrozo 4712 392

[Bug target/11716] [mips] branch out of range when building fold-const.c

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11716 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

Bug#206715: gcc fails to parse correctly the __asm__ __volatile__ section

Package: gcc Version: 1:3.3.1-0pre0 Problem: gcc fails to parse correctly the __asm__ __volatile__ section Reproductivity: kernel 2.4.16 recompilation - /include/asm-i386/checksum.h Distribution: sarge Source of he kernel is not in /usr/src but in

Excelsior Designs Information Request

Thank you for your interest in Excelsior Designs furniture. Your request for additional information will be personally responded to as quickly as possible. A store that carries the Excelsior collection in the area where you reside will be provided along with their address and telephone

Bug#206715: marked as done (gcc fails to parse correctly the __asm__ __volatile__ section)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Aug 2003 14:13:15 +0200 (CEST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#206715: gcc fails to parse correctly the __asm__ __volatile__ section has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

[Bug c/11949] [3.3.1 regression] Compiler segfault with ffmpeg altivec code

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11949 --- Additional Comments From kraai at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-22 16:19 --- I've backported, bootstrapped, and regression tested the patch from comment #2 and

[Bug c/11942] restrict is broken in C99 mode?

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11942 dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target

[Bug preprocessor/11931] unjustified warning for C89 code using HUGE_VAL

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11931 dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target

Bug#166940: [Bug target/10984] x86/sse2 ICEs on vector intrinsics with constant argument

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10984 dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target

[Bug c/11459] -ansi -std=c99 -pedantic warns about C90's non long-long support when in C99 mode

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11459 dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target

[Bug target/11442] [3.3 regression] [arm] invalid assembler on arm

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11442 dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added GCC build

[Bug target/11877] gcc should use xor trick with -Os

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11877 dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added GCC build

[Bug libgcj/11941] gcj handles timezones wrongly

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11941 dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target

[Bug c/11943] Accepts invalid declaration int x[2, 3]; in C99 mode

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11943 dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target

[Bug target/11983] ICE in dwarf-2 on code using altivec

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11983 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added