[Bug target/12527] [3.4 regression] [arm] bootstrap error on arm-linux, miscompiling genconstants

2003-10-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12527 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/12567] g++ fails to recognize ill-formed-ness of initilaizers

2003-10-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12567 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/12567] g++ fails to recognize ill-formed-ness of initilaizers

2003-10-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12567 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug driver/12564] deprecate -V or update documentation

2003-10-10 Thread geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12564 geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

Results for 3.4 20031005 (experimental) testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

2003-10-10 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Oct 5 19:09:38 UTC 2003 Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-1.C (test for excess errors) WARNING: g++.dg/eh/simd-1.C compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-2.C (test

Bug#211783: Fw: Re: Bug#211783: gcc-3.3 3.3.2-0pre3 breaks ide-scsi.o in kernel 2.4.21 or 2.4.22

2003-10-10 Thread FreddyK.
Begin forwarded message: Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 16:25:32 +0200 From: "FreddyK." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Bug#211783: gcc-3.3 3.3.2-0pre3 breaks ide-scsi.o in kernel 2.4.21 or 2.4.22 On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 09:04:36 +0200 Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTEC

[schwab@suse.de: Re: [PATCH] Support backtrace () on IA-64, make it work even with -fomit-frame-pointer on AMD64]

2003-10-10 Thread Jeff Bailey
Doko & GCC folks, FYI - This may be a critical patch needed for ia64's glibc. When doing some testing with upstream CVS 2 days ago, I noticed the backtrace failure, and this thread popped up at the same time. Would you consider applying this patch during the next gcc upload? If you want to read

Bug#197090: marked as done (gcj-3.3: babel fails with 3.3, works with 3.2...)

2003-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:45:36 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line babel builds with current gcj-3.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#150357: Health, Impotence, Allergy Relief, Heartburn Relief, Migraine Relief and MORE! 239834

2003-10-10 Thread 239834
Title: Wholesale Prescription Medications! Wholesale Prescription Medications! OUR DOCTORS WILL WRITE YOU A PRESCRIPTION FOR FREE! Get Your Prescription Meds Online 239834 3449BD09-1F69492F-170412A5-6A6C2874-6B2B1EEB 1175671379 Meds like: Phentermine, Adipex, Soma,

Bug#117765: Free prescriptions, limited time offer 239834

2003-10-10 Thread 239834
Title: Wholesale Prescription Medications! Wholesale Prescription Medications! OUR DOCTORS WILL WRITE YOU A PRESCRIPTION FOR FREE! Get Your Prescription Meds Online 239834 70230A0F-5C521DDB-16AF0A36-2C40FCB6-5A1021D9 310459767 Meds like: Phentermine, Adipex, Soma, Fioric

Processed: tagging gcc reports as fixed-upstream

2003-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 195480 + fixed-upstream Bug#195480: [fixed in 3.4] gcj-3.3 thinks a decl conflicts with itself Tags were: upstream Tags added: fixed-upstream > tags 197674 + fixed-upstream Bug#197674: [fixed in 3.4] ICE in regenerate_decl_from_template Tags were:

[Bug driver/12564] deprecate -V or update documentation

2003-10-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12564 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

Bug#207671: marked as done (bad include)

2003-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Oct 2003 09:16:35 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#207671: bad include has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#210565: marked as done (Recent regression: x is an inaccessible base of y (within gtkmm2))

2003-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Oct 2003 09:10:37 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#210565: Recent regression: x is an inaccessible base of y (within gtkmm2) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#198172: status update on miscompilation at -O2 on arm?

2003-10-10 Thread Matthias Klose
Please could you recheck with current gcc-3.3? gcc-3.4 isn't a choice to test, as it fails to build on arm. Matthias

Bug#206281: gcc-3.3: unknown package failure, compile quits, constant error msgs

2003-10-10 Thread Matthias Klose
Sean Morton writes: > Package: gcc-3.3 > Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre1 > Severity: normal > Tags: sid > > > I've tried older versions of gcc, tried reinstalling, etc., to now > avail. Here is the complete error message I get when trying to > compile a kernel. It's quite long, but I get almost the same