Bug#215445: ...

2003-10-12 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Known issue. You need to specify --main on the command line, as follows: gcj primerprog.java --main=primerprog This should be downgraded to 'wishlist', since it's documented. In multi-class projects, it's obvious that you need to do this. There are plans to eventually make gcj clever enough

Bug#215445: gcj-3.3: no compila un archivo

2003-10-12 Thread Cristian Aravena R.
Package: gcj-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre4 Severity: normal [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcj primerprog.java /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.2/../../../crt1.o(.text+0x18): En la función `_start': : undefined reference to `main' collect2: ld devolvió el estado de salida 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ javac primerpro

[Bug optimization/11350] [3.3/3.4 regression] undefined labels with -Os -fPIC

2003-10-12 Thread kischde at gmx dot net
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11350 kischde at gmx dot net changed: What|Removed |Added

Processed: patch

2003-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 203835 + patch Bug#203835: [PR 11793] [3.3.1/3.4 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2175 Tags were: upstream Bug#205899: gcc-3.3: [ppc] ICE on code using altivec Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if y

Bug#202859: marked as done ([PR 11716] [mips] branch out of range when building fold-const.c)

2003-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 12 Oct 2003 09:45:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#203835: patch

2003-10-12 Thread Ryan Murray
tag 203835 + patch thanks There is a patch for 3.3 that looks to have been ignored on the mailing list at: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-08/msg01356.html

[Bug libstdc++/8610] large file support in libstdc++-v3 (std::streamoff type is 32-bit in GCC 3.2 whereas it was 64-bit in GCC 2.96)

2003-10-12 Thread gcc at warped-space dot de
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8610 gcc at warped-space dot de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/12527] [3.4 regression] [arm] bootstrap error on arm-linux, miscompiling genconstants

2003-10-12 Thread doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12527 --- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-10-12 07:24 --- Subject: Re: [3.4 regression] [arm] bootstrap error on arm-linux, miscompiling genconst