Package: gcc
Version: 2:2.95.4-14
Severity: minor
When compiling libzorpll on alpha, I got the following
warning. I don't know if it is a libc or gcc bug, I file
it against gcc, because libc uses
#ifdef __USE_XOPEN
# ifdef __GNUC__
# ifndef _VA_LIST_DEFINED
libc version:
ii libc6.1-dev
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12371
--- Additional Comments From bernie at develer dot com 2003-10-31 21:21
---
These are my m68k patches from the relevant
time frame:
2003-09-03 Bernardo Innocenti
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Oct 30 22:06:32 UTC 2003
=== ACATS tests ===
FAIL: c34005a
FAIL: c34005d
FAIL: c34005g
FAIL: c34005j
FAIL: cc3601a
FAIL: cxb3010
FAIL: cxb3014
FAIL: cxb3015
=== ACATS Summary ===
# of expected passes 2314
# of unexpected failures 8
Native
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12315
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-01
00:48 ---
Subject: Bug 12315
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by:
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12421
Bug 12421 depends on bug 12315, which changed state.
Bug 12315 Summary: [3.4 Regression] ICE using -p with functions returning
structs
In reference to a message from Daniel Jacobowitz, dated Oct 31:
Are you sure he doesn't mean --enable-checking? --enable-debug should
not affect compile time significantly.
yup, David confirmed he meant enable-checking. thanks for the quick
reply.
randolph
--
Randolph Chung
Debian GNU/Linux
6 matches
Mail list logo