Bug#218459: gcc: duplicate declaration of va_list

2003-10-31 Thread Magossa'nyi A'rpa
Package: gcc Version: 2:2.95.4-14 Severity: minor When compiling libzorpll on alpha, I got the following warning. I don't know if it is a libc or gcc bug, I file it against gcc, because libc uses #ifdef __USE_XOPEN # ifdef __GNUC__ # ifndef _VA_LIST_DEFINED libc version: ii libc6.1-dev

[Bug target/12371] [3.4 regression] [m68k-linux] bootstrap error in make compare

2003-10-31 Thread bernie at develer dot com
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12371 --- Additional Comments From bernie at develer dot com 2003-10-31 21:21 --- These are my m68k patches from the relevant time frame: 2003-09-03 Bernardo Innocenti

Results for 3.4 20031030 (experimental) testsuite on i486-pc-linux-gnu

2003-10-31 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Oct 30 22:06:32 UTC 2003 === ACATS tests === FAIL: c34005a FAIL: c34005d FAIL: c34005g FAIL: c34005j FAIL: cc3601a FAIL: cxb3010 FAIL: cxb3014 FAIL: cxb3015 === ACATS Summary === # of expected passes 2314 # of unexpected failures 8 Native

[Bug other/12315] [3.4 Regression] ICE using -p with functions returning structs

2003-10-31 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12315 --- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-01 00:48 --- Subject: Bug 12315 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by:

[Bug c++/12421] [3.4 regression] ICE with -pg

2003-10-31 Thread amodra at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12421 Bug 12421 depends on bug 12315, which changed state. Bug 12315 Summary: [3.4 Regression] ICE using -p with functions returning structs

Re: FWD: gcc in debian/unstable

2003-10-31 Thread Randolph Chung
In reference to a message from Daniel Jacobowitz, dated Oct 31: Are you sure he doesn't mean --enable-checking? --enable-debug should not affect compile time significantly. yup, David confirmed he meant enable-checking. thanks for the quick reply. randolph -- Randolph Chung Debian GNU/Linux