Investors: Come see Wall Streets only scale-trading system for blue-chip stocks
- MainScale
We DO NOT TOUT INDIVIDUAL STOCKS - This is an automated, stock-trading system
for blue-chips only
www.mainscale4u.com/?032335
MainScale started on October 1, 2002
Here are the results our investors h
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 08:43:14PM +, James Troup wrote:
>> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Clint Adams writes:
>> >> Package: gcc
>> >> Version: 4:3.3.1-2
>> >> File: /usr/bin/gcc
>> >>
>> >> Please make the sparc gcc wrapper opti
Camm Maguire wrote:
Greetings! I will try, but I'm running short on time until the end of
the year. Strategically, do we want these to get fixed for sarge, or
can we live with the status quo? Also, happy to instruct anyone with
more time on what to do. I'll do a snapshot build on merulo and see
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/bitfield4.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/empty6.C (test for warnings, line 6)
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/cleanup1.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.eh/spec3.C Executi
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 08:43:14PM +, James Troup wrote:
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Clint Adams writes:
> >> Package: gcc
> >> Version: 4:3.3.1-2
> >> File: /usr/bin/gcc
> >>
> >> Please make the sparc gcc wrapper optional for those of us who would
> >> prefer a symlin
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Nov 16 11:24:54 UTC 2003
Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/ext/lvalue1.C not an lvalue (test for errors, line 7)
FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/using9.C (test for errors, line 7)
FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/using9.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Nov 16 11:24:54 UTC 2003
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c32111a
FAIL: c32111b
FAIL: c32112b
FAIL: c32113a
FAIL: c32115a
FAIL: c32115b
FAIL: c330001
FAIL: c330002
FAIL: c34001c
FAIL: c34001f
FAIL: c34002c
FAIL: c34003c
FAIL: c34005a
FAIL: c34
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Nov 16 11:24:54 UTC 2003
Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/ext/lvalue1.C not an lvalue (test for errors, line 7)
FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/using9.C (test for errors, line 7)
FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/usin
Investors: Come see Wall Streets only scale-trading system for blue-chip stocks
- MainScale
We DO NOT TOUT INDIVIDUAL STOCKS - This is an automated, stock-trading system
for blue-chips only
www.mainscale4u.com/?032335
MainScale started on October 1, 2002
Here are the results our investors h
How about I add a file you can touch, like /etc/disable_64_gcc, and then
gcc will revert to the previous behavior no matter what?
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
Your message dated Mon, 17 Nov 2003 22:17:57 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not a bug...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Clint Adams writes:
>> Package: gcc
>> Version: 4:3.3.1-2
>> File: /usr/bin/gcc
>>
>> Please make the sparc gcc wrapper optional for those of us who would
>> prefer a symlink to gcc-3.3.
>
> why is it annoying? it just works.
Not really. It, AIUI, bl
Clint Adams writes:
> Package: gcc
> Version: 4:3.3.1-2
> File: /usr/bin/gcc
>
> Please make the sparc gcc wrapper optional for those of us who would
> prefer a symlink to gcc-3.3.
why is it annoying? it just works.
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.2ds4-3
Severity: normal
Hello GCC maintainers,
On ia64, gcc fails to compile the following file
(available at
http://people.debian.org/~ballombe/misc/test2.c
)
merulo% gcc test2.c
test2.c: In function `muluu':
test2.c:20: error: `asm' operand requires impossible r
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Akim Demaille
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: warning: `e' has incomplete type without location
>Severity:
>Priority:
>Category: c++
>Class:
>Release: 3.3.2 (Debian) (Debian testing/unstable)
>Environment:
Syst
Package: gcc
Version: 4:3.3.1-2
File: /usr/bin/gcc
Please make the sparc gcc wrapper optional for those of us who would
prefer a symlink to gcc-3.3.
Greetings! I will try, but I'm running short on time until the end of
the year. Strategically, do we want these to get fixed for sarge, or
can we live with the status quo? Also, happy to instruct anyone with
more time on what to do. I'll do a snapshot build on merulo and see
how compilcated thi
Your message dated Mon, 17 Nov 2003 11:34:48 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #216234,
regarding g++-3.3: template function triggers syntax error
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(NB: If you are a s
Accepted:
cpp-3.3_3.3.2-4_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3.2-4_m68k.deb
fastjar_3.3.2-4_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fastjar_3.3.2-4_m68k.deb
fixincludes_3.3.2-4_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fixincludes_3.3.2-4_m68k.deb
g++-3.3_3.3.2-4_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/g++-3
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-17
08:37 ---
I think the bug is generic.
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|target
There exists a conversion from streampos to streamoff, so that the
expression can be interpreted as
=09(streamoff)pos - 1
or
=09pos.operator-(1)
In both cases conversions are used (from streampos to streamoff, and
from int to long). The ambiguouity can be resolved be writing
=09pos - 1L
Probably th
21 matches
Mail list logo
