Ben, please could you update the status regarding newer gcj-3.3 /
gcc-snapshot packages?
Yep, sorry - got quite a bit busy these last few weeks. I will get to
it.
b.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# submitted Debian report #228645 to gcc-gnats as PR 13943
# http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13943
forwarded 228645 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13943
Bug#228645: libstdc++5-3.3-dev: call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous
Noted your statement that Bug has been
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# submitted Debian report #228099 to gcc-gnats as PR 13944
# http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13944
forwarded 228099 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13944
Bug#228099: g++-3.3: exception in constructor of a class to be thrown is not
caught
Noted your statement that Bug has
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# submitted Debian report #226952 to gcc-gnats as PR 13945
# http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13945
forwarded 226952 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13945
Bug#226952: gcc-3.3: -Wconversion is annoying
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# submitted Debian report #212248 to gcc-gnats as PR 13946
# http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13946
forwarded 212248 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13946
Bug#212248: gcc-3.3: build fail for libobj not including boehm-gc include files
Noted your statement that Bug has been
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# submitted Debian report #215445 to gcc-gnats as PR 2370
# http://gcc.gnu.org/PR2370
forwarded 215445 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR2370
Bug#215445: --main needs to be always specified on command line
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# submitted Debian report #222497 to gcc-gnats as PR 13947
# http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13947
forwarded 222497 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13947
Bug#222497: ptr_fun doesn't recognise argument
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 226670 bison-1.35
Bug#226670: gcc-3.3: implicitly declared function returns a pointer that is used
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.3' to `bison-1.35'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
#~n1Mr|b~T?{34z(poDr_?.L,r(Xj
lOeMwhla^I
HqC)3*?k`#|XMha0B9?X$2Wo~j|ckeW$B(
u}tpm$_S\{\P1DH,M?$Sk
L2*sTzJ6_t%L}Y}G?Fy:*E\XY.hscsy55ku`%GZ?PGo
XWfJiwIYt.2V?~.G:czn_v)8Q(Z
?0'uJqPK#M{XzS){5a/?3%ns)6{DSWYat?~QdXx7q13}Ii}/a%^
Fgn66BW*55f
Ppa*$m\FCNiZuanov$d7#Vjfcx?{KH?S7ld.Nsl
]M^KH?u]$Fh/UuAVV6x
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-31
18:24 ---
This is a dup of bug 6614.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 6614 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-31
18:24 ---
*** Bug 13945 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-31
18:25 ---
I will try to deal with this with my clean up branch.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-31
19:08 ---
*** Bug 13947 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
Please could you recheck the status of the two reports with current
gcc-3.3 from unstable, and if you see the same behaviour, try to
reproduce it with gcc-snapshot (gcc-3.4)?
Thanks, Matthias
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 08:32:51PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Please could you recheck the status of the two reports with current
gcc-3.3 from unstable, and if you see the same behaviour, try to
reproduce it with gcc-snapshot (gcc-3.4)?
I still see the same memory consumption with current
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||2.95.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5458
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jan 25 16:09:13 UTC 2004
Native configuration is m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/bitfield4.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/empty6.C (test for warnings, line 6)
FAIL: g++.eh/spec3.C Execution test
FAIL:
17 matches
Mail list logo
